Hi Luca, Il giorno mer 7 ago 2019 alle ore 11:48 Luca Boccassi < luca.bocca...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Thank you, that's great! > I may be able to repeat also the same tests, still on 10Gb optical link, using 2 Mellanox CX5 NICs... I will post here new results if I can. Getting anywhere close to 10gig line rate without bypassing the kernel TCP > stack is not really likely - as you correctly pointed out, the way to do > that would be to use a different stack based on DPDK (or XDP) like VPP or > F-stack. I have briefly looked into this in the past, but didn't have time > to do anything. It's a lot of integration work. > I agree - I wonder if things could be different if ZMQ had a sponsor to support it... Another improvement that can help is using the new zero-copy kernel TCP > read/write APIs - I had started something a couple of years back, but again > didn't have time to complete it. > This looks very interesting as well.. do you have any pointer to these new zero-copy kernel APIs? Thanks, Francesco > > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 00:34 +0200, Francesco wrote: > > Hi Luca, Hi all, > > I generated the results graph and put all of them here: > > http://zeromq.org/results:10gbe-tests-v432 > > I would say the results are ok but perhaps there's room for improvements. > For example: the local_thr/remote_thr benchmarks show that ZeroMQ is able > to fill the 10Gbps link only using message sizes of about 10kB. > The CPUs of the test spiked at about 3.5 Mpps @ 16B message-size which is > a bit far from the theoretical max of Ethernet that for 84B frames (on the > wire) is 14.8Mpps (see > https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB14737). > > I wonder how ZeroMQ message batching mechanism works for small messages > (<1kB) on TCP... anybody can shed some light on this? Thanks! > > Francesco > > > PS: any project to use something like F-stack (http://www.f-stack.org/) > on top of DPDK as backend for ZeroMQ :) ? > > > > > Il giorno dom 4 ago 2019 alle ore 20:41 Luca Boccassi < > luca.bocca...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > Looks great, thank you! > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, 18:28 Francesco, <francesco.monto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > There's nothing that I know of for that purpose > > I wrote a 70lines bash script to automate the collection of performance > results using "{local/remote/inproc/proxy}_{thr/lat}" ZMQ performance > utils... > I created a PR for that: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/3607 > > Let me know if that works for you. > > As soon as I have the HW available I will use them to generate the new > graphs... > > Thanks > > Francesco > > Il giorno sab 3 ago 2019 alle ore 11:39 Luca Boccassi < > luca.bocca...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > There's nothing that I know of for that purpose > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2019, 10:24 Francesco, <francesco.monto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Luca, > I don't have a wikidot account... however I have a basic question before > getting there: > local_thr / remote_thr > utilities are just producing a text output... is there any script to: > 1) run them automatically to generate all points of the per-message-size > graphs (http://zeromq.org/results:10gbe-tests-v031) ? > 2) produce the actual graph from the collected text outputs ? > > Thanks, > Francesco > > > > Il giorno sab 3 ago 2019 alle ore 00:40 Luca Boccassi < > luca.bocca...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > Yes please! > > Do you have an account on wikidot to edit the page? > > On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, 21:54 Francesco, <francesco.monto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > I noticed that all performance results reported at this page: > http://zeromq.org/area:results > seem a bit outdated (most updated version looks like ØMQ/2.0.6 !)... has > anybody updated results? > Alternatively I may be able to generate measurements on latest libzmq on > 10G NICs... would you be interested in putting on that page updated results? > > Thanks, > Francesco > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > -- > > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
