http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=165558

For business-led inclusive growth

Banks can play a big role if they understand the dynamics of deprivation

Tamal Sarkar

  Government organisations (GOs) and non-government organisations (NGOs)
  are recognised and promoted as best suited for development
  management—be it income generation or capability creation, especially
  for poverty-stricken household or micro units. There are a few points
  here to note. First, in the absence of direct involvement of an
  institution in promoting income generation, community stakeholders
  often perceive pure capability development as a free service. Second,
  stakeholders are keener on partnering with institutions that can offer
  direct market opportunities apart from capability creation. Thus, in
  the field of income generation, institutions like Ahmedabad-based Sewa
  and Dastkar have an edge over GOs/NGOs that only impart skills. This
  is more so for micro and poverty intensive enterprises, which can
  least afford to either scout for various support services (due to high
  transaction costs) or spend time in organising themselves only to see
  their efforts get diluted on account of inadequate market promotion.
  Third, income generation gets priority over capability creation in
  rural development, and this boosts the process of getting organised.
  This happens faster if there are income possibilities, either based on
  the organisation's track record or nature of activity.

Fourth, developmental enterprises are already at equilibrium, and they
deploy their resources seriously only for significant changes that
promise a substantial difference in outcome. There is a serious shortage
of such multi-purpose development institutions.

Here, the role of banking/quasi-banking (that is, microfinance)
institutions is of critical importance. First, being in finance, banking
institutions understand business better than many NGOs and GOs. Second,
the involvement of banking (type) units attaches a brand to the process
of business delivery, which is vital at this point of inflection—as tiny
units take their first steps towards big/serious business. Third, it is
recognised that microcredit (for both business and consumption) is a
serious business opportunity in India, with its 'demand' pegged at an
estimated annual Rs 130,000 crore (including consumption loans). This is
a sizeable figure by any yardstick.

While it is encouraging that banks are flush with funds for this
purpose, the challenge is that this potentially huge market is not ready
to "shoot" in terms of absorption of such finance. Hence, despite the
supply ease, there are natural constraints on potential demand. Thus,
there is a critical gap in terms of investment required for preparing
this market for loan absorption as well as for smooth repaying capacity
thereafter. Clearly, this is a non-business element, and the moot point
is whether this can be converted into a business plan for the entry of
the vast network of banking or quasi-banking enterprises into
development by promoting business first.

Well, one thing is for sure, and that is the natural propensity of
business units to first achieve business growth and then go for the
necessary capability creation to sustain this growth. Here, the
instinctive business agenda of banks would help. They also have the
advantage of linkages to a host of business units that can be signed on
as appropriate value-chain partners for the promotion of these units.
Banks can also promote various specialised service providers.


While banks are flush with funds, the challenge is that this potentially
huge market is not ready to "shoot" in terms of absorption of finance

Again, it is but natural that when a particular bank branch thinks in
terms of providing such services, it makes sense to concentrate on one
or few products in that region (say, micro/artisan clusters). But during
the process of such development, we must assess 'efficiency' as much as
the likelihood of taking 'equity' along. We must especially track the
involvement of the poorest units, which are capable but are either
underinformed or inelastic in their response to market needs (unable,
that is, to change their current "low level equilibrium"). External
value chain partners are not likely to make special efforts to address
such non-market issues. If local NGOs become part of the local power
structure that is tilted against the most deprived (as is the case at
times), then they too are constrained in their ability to address this
issue. As a result, relative poverty could worsen—with severe social
repercussions.

In sum, we find that in income generation activities,
financial/quasi-financial institutions score a point over at least a
section of the traditional engines of development management, and can
certainly be an alternate channel. However, while promoting such
business-led growth of micro/poverty intensive units in clusters, there
are some non-market phenomena that must not be ignored. These include
(a) demand generation through linkage creation and (b) ensuring long-run
equity as an integrated process through the same institutional mechanism
that promotes business. This will ensure low delivery cost and
cross-learning. It is here that public development funds must support
the banking/quasi-banking system in the promotion of genuinely inclusive
market-led growth. This would include support for smart, impartial
growth managers who can be put in charge of systems designed to ensure
inclusive growth through startup funds, training and other efforts.

—Tamal Sarkar is programme coordinator, Foundation for MSME Clusters.
These are his personal views


--
Subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a BLANK email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you 
have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to