Global economy is dangerously out of balance
The US economy is overstretched and the economies of the countries that
might be expected to pick up the slack -- Germany and Japan -- are
faltering 

By J. Bradford Delong
Taipei Times | March 18, 2005 
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit/archives/2005/03/18/2003246767


Once again, Germany and Japan have slipped into recession. Once again,
the second and third largest of the world's major industrial economies
are subtracting from, not adding to, growth in the world's aggregate
demand. 

>From the standpoint of German and Japanese citizens, this is bad news.
Rapidly improving global technologies should make it relatively easy to
deliver rising levels of output and living standards. Yet the German and
the Japanese economies have had a hard time doing so for the past decade
and a half. Certainly, everyone anticipated 115 years ago that the
current state of both economies would be much better. 

>From the standpoint of global political stability, recession and
stagnation in Germany and Japan is potentially even worse news.
Democratic governments make a bargain with their people, gaining their
long-run legitimacy from their ability to deliver rising living
standards and high employment. 

Crisis, depression and stagnation make people's thoughts turn to the
fecklessness and corruption of mainstream politicians, the illegitimate
powers of special interests and the cretinism of parliaments. The
thoughts people think in times of crisis and depression are not false.
Mainstream politicians are often feckless and corrupt (morally if not
legally), special interests do have mighty and illegitimate powers, and
legislatures are often cretinous. But there is no country in which
attempts to draw political conclusions from these popular sentiments
have not ended in disaster. 
>From the standpoint of global economic stability, the failure of growth
in Germany and Japan is perhaps the worst news of all. Six or seven
years ago, there were vague worries that the world economy's developed
core could not run indefinitely on one locomotive, the US, alone. 

Now, due to appalling fiscal policy on the part of US President George
W. Bush's administration and some bad luck, the US economy has wedged
itself into a very uncomfortable position, hemmed in by its huge budget
and trade deficits. 
Un-wedging the US without a crisis -- attaining the economists' grail of
a "soft landing" -- requires that a great many people and institutions
with enormous holdings of dollar-denominated assets passively stand by
and take no action while those dollar-denominated assets lose a third or
more of their value against other currencies. 
There is a recent precedent for this: From 1985 to 1987, holders of
dollar-denominated assets took a similar, but much smaller, bath. But
can you step into the same river twice? 

Moreover, achieving a successful soft landing requires more than that
holders of dollar-denominated assets be tranquilized into catatonia
while they lose their shirts. It also requires that at least 8 million
US workers who are now employed in construction, consumer services and
related industries find new jobs in export and import-competing
industries. 

That's not all. At least 16 million workers outside the US who are now
employed making exports to the US would have to find jobs in other
sectors as well. These jobs will have to fulfill demand coming from
outside the US, because as a falling dollar and possibly a domestic
recession shrinks the gap between US demand and US production, there
must be a countervailing boost to demand relative to production outside
the US. 

When the rebalancing comes -- and it has already been delayed longer
than I would have thought likely -- it is important that, as former US
treasury secretary Larry Summers used to say, the world economy balance
up rather than down. 

Without a rapidly growing Germany and Japan, where will the demand
needed to "balance up" the world economy come from in the next several
years? A generation from now, we will probably be able to point to China
and India as rapidly growing capital-hungry markets capable of filling
gaps in global demand. But not yet. While China and India are enormous
in terms of workers, they are still small in terms of output and demand.


Without rapid demand growth somewhere in the developed world outside the
US -- and Germany and Japan are the best places to look -- it is hard to
see how the global economy can balance itself at a high level over the
next few years. 

------------------------------------
J. Bradford DeLong is professor of economics at the University of
California at Berkeley and was assistant US treasury secretary during
the Clinton presidency.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RzSHvD/UOnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to