Measuring Globalization 
  The fifth annual A.T. Kearney/FOREIGN POLICY Globalization Index 
shows that global integration survived the turbulence of the Iraq 
war, a sharp economic downturn, and the failure of trade talks. Our 
ranking of political, economic, personal, and technological 
globalization in 62 countries reveals that the world is still coming 
together. Find out who's up, who's down, and how they got there.

  By A.T. Kearney / Foreign Policy 
  Foreign Policy | May/June 2005
  For graphix please visit:
  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/files/story2823.php 
  
 
The noted international economist Joseph Stiglitz called 2003 "a 
disaster for globalization." At one level, he was right. The Iraq 
war and its aftermath created deep fissures between the United 
States and its allies, and the great majority of countries who 
opposed the war. The U.N. Security Council, the lead body for 
international peace and security issues, was dealt a blow by the 
willingness of the coalition to launch a military campaign without 
its blessing. The war even prompted boycotts and muttering about 
possible trade embargoes. 

During the height of the Iraq controversy, some German restaurants 
posted signs reading, "Sorry, Coca-Cola is not available any more 
due to the current political situation." The desire to express 
political differences at the cash register was reciprocated in the 
United States. One 2003 poll showed that nearly half of Americans 
preferred not to buy French goods. Even White House Chief of Staff 
Andrew Card was reported to have said that "Virginia wine is fine 
with me."  

Economically, the year did not begin much better. Foreign investment 
flows slowed, and trade was stagnant for the first half of the year. 
In its meeting at Canc�n, Mexico, the World Trade Organization (WTO) 
failed to agree on the reduction of powerful agricultural subsidies 
in the United States and Europe. What might have been a dramatic 
expansion of free trade fizzled, leaving behind no obvious roadmap 
for progress. In the realm of public health, the SARS epidemic 
grounded global travelers and exposed unsettling gaps in 
international health monitoring. Tourism to Asia dropped 
precipitously as a result�by as much as 50 percent in some 
countries. 

Yet this year's edition of the A.T. Kearney/FOREIGN POLICY 
Globalization Index shows that the multifaceted force called 
globalization is made of sterner stuff. By the second half of 2003, 
the ties that bind were connecting us once again. Global trade, 
which grew at less than 1 percent in the first quarter, jumped by 
more than 5 percent in the second half of the year. Global 
development aid improved dramatically. The Organisation for Economic 
Co-operation and Development estimated that official development 
assistance reached a record $69 billion. The largest increase came 
from the United States, which boosted foreign aid by more than 20 
percent.  

The resilience of globalization indicates that it is a phenomenon 
that runs deeper than the political crises of the day. In an effort 
to measure its many dimensions, the index looks behind the headlines 
by using several indicators spanning trade, finance, political 
engagement, information technology, and personal contact to 
determine the rankings of 62 countries. These 62 countries together 
account for 96 percent of the world's gross domestic product (GDP) 
and 85 percent of the world's population. The index measures 12 
variables, which are divided into four "baskets": economic 
integration, technological connectivity, personal contact, and 
political engagement.  

The resulting rankings offer an important high-altitude look at 
which countries are globalizing and which are not. But sifting 
through the data that come out of the index also yields some 
interesting stories behind the broader trends.  

The Winners' Circle 

The luck of the Irish finally ran out, as last year's runner-up, 
Singapore, took the top spot in this year's ranking, ending 
Ireland's three-year streak. One key to Singapore's rise was its 
increased political engagement. The island nation built bridges in 
2003�increasing its financial contribution to U.N. peacekeeping 
missions by 41 percent. (Indeed, a Singaporean general commanded the 
peacekeeping force in East Timor for much of 2003.) Singapore 
solidified its first-place ranking in foreign trade by signing a 
bilateral free trade agreement with the United States in May 2003, 
the first such agreement the United States had signed with an Asian 
nation. Meanwhile, Ireland's strong economy slumped, with GDP growth 
sliding from a robust 6.9 percent in 2002 to a tepid 1.8 percent in 
2003. There was other movement in the top five. Finland fell from 
fifth to 10th place. The United States jumped from seventh to fourth 
and became the first large country to crack the top five. Nations 
with large populations (and large domestic markets) generally fare 
worse in the index because they are typically less dependent on 
foreign trade and investment. The strong U.S. showing is primarily a 
result of its remarkable technological prowess. 

o o o o o 

A.T. Kearney is a registered service mark of A.T. Kearney, Inc. 
FOREIGN POLICY is a registered trademark owned by the Carnegie 
Endowment for International Peace.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TzSHvD/SOnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to