Another weird conundrum. Long term interest rates are normally expected to be 
higher than short term interest rates to compensate investors for the higher 
risks involved. However the recent phenomena of rising short term interest 
rates and falling long term bond yields has many Wall Street honchos and even 
the legendary, Alan Greenspan baffled. Read on to find out why?



 Long-Term Interest Rates Buck Conventional Wisdom
  By Tom Petruno
  Los Angeles Times | 10 June, 2005
  http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-rates10jun10,0,4694398.story?
coll==la-home-headlines

The surest bet on Wall Street a year ago was that long-term interest 
rates would rise, boosting the cost of home mortgages and in general 
making credit tougher to get.

That forecast seemed to make perfect sense because the Federal 
Reserve was raising its bellwether short-term rate for the first 
time since 2000. Long-term rates usually move in tandem.

But that sure bet has been a big bust: To the shock of most 
investment pros as well as the Fed � and to the relief of home 
buyers � long-term rates have tumbled, even as the Fed has raised 
its key rate eight times over the last year, from 1% to 3%.

While the housing market celebrates the good news of 30-year 
mortgage rates under 5.6%, down from 6.3% a year ago, a lot of 
financial professionals have egg on their faces.

"Basically, 100% of economists have gotten the direction of long-
term interest rates wrong," said Steven Permut, a money manager at 
American Century Investments in Mountain View, Calif.

Now, a new school of thought is developing among market analysts. 
Some believe long-term rates could hold at current levels for years, 
or even fall further to low single digits. In a world awash in 
savings, investors' urgency to lock in returns on fixed-rate, long-
term IOUs like bonds will help keep a lid on rates in general, they 
say.

Bill Gross, chief investment officer at Newport Beach-based Pacific 
Investment Management Co. and one of the world's top authorities on 
interest rates, says it's conceivable that the rate on the 10-year 
U.S. Treasury note, a benchmark for mortgages and other long-term 
interest rates, could drop to 3% in the next three to five years. 
Currently it's just under 4%.

If he's right, that could mean that far lower mortgage rates lie 
ahead � which could provide a bailout for people who have
purchased 
homes with huge, interest-only loans and are hoping to eventually 
refinance with more favorable terms.

Some experts, however, say Wall Street is taking a familiar tack: 
Tired of being beaten by the market for so long, more analysts now 
are joining it.

"We're probably reaching a point where everyone just throws in the 
towel" on the idea of higher long-term interest rates, said Michael 
Darda, an economist at investment firm MKM Partners in Greenwich, 
Conn.

But that kind of capitulation often signals the end of the very 
trend that investors are jumping aboard, he said.

Recent history provides a glaring example, Darda said. In the first 
few months of 2000, after two years of spectacular gains in 
technology stocks, many investors who had avoided the shares in 1998 
and 1999 were scrambling to get in at any price. That proved to be 
the zenith for the tech mania.

For its part, the Federal Reserve says it can't explain why interest 
rates have diverged. In testimony before Congress' Joint Economic 
Committee on Thursday, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said "something 
unusual is clearly at play here" � repeating a view he has had
since 
February, when he called the decline in long-term rates 
a "conundrum."

The Fed, as the nation's central bank, controls short-term interest 
rates by changing the so-called federal funds rate, or what 
commercial banks charge each other for overnight loans.

Historically, the Fed has raised that rate when it wanted to slow 
the economy, usually because inflation pressures were building.

And when the Fed is lifting its key rate, long-term rates typically 
rise as well. But the Fed doesn't directly control long-term rates. 
They are set in the marketplace � for example, by the level of 
interest investors demand on government bonds.

The annualized yield, or interest rate, on the 10-year Treasury note 
was as high as 4.87% a year ago, just before the Fed began raising 
its short-term rate from a four-decade low of 1% to the current 3%.

On Thursday, the yield on the Treasury note was nearly a full 
percentage point lower, at 3.95%.

What's more, the downtrend in long-term rates has been a global 
phenomenon. Government bond yields have fallen to generational lows 
this spring in major European economies such as Germany and minor 
ones such as Lithuania and Estonia.

In Japan, long the home of the world's lowest interest rates, the 
yield on the government's 10-year bond is at 1.23%, down from 1.78% 
a year ago.

It isn't just government bond yields that have plummeted. High-risk 
companies that borrow via so-called junk bonds also are paying less 
today for money than a year ago.

Stephen Roach, an economist at brokerage Morgan Stanley in New York, 
had been expecting U.S. long-term rates to rise this year. But last 
month he changed his forecast. "I now suspect bond yields will stay 
low for the foreseeable future," he said.

He cites, in part, the continuing hunger many investors � and 
speculators � have shown worldwide for bonds. As more people step
up 
to buy, the effect is to allow governments and other bond issuers to 
pay less on their IOUs. That drives other long-term rates lower as 
well.

And because the world economy continues to expand, there is plenty 
of wealth around looking for a place to go, economists say. Nations 
such as China, which have huge trade surpluses with the U.S. but no 
significant bond markets of their own, have funneled large chunks of 
their savings into U.S. and other foreign securities.

Roach believes the desire to lock in fixed-rate returns on bonds 
also reflects a more cautious global attitude about risk taking, 
especially in the stock market.

"With the days of heady, late-1990s-style returns on equities long 
thought to be over, fixed-income investments have become the new 
asset class of choice," he said.

A Merrill Lynch & Co. survey of the world's millionaires, issued 
Thursday, showed that they on average had 27% of their financial 
assets in bonds last year, up from 25% in 2003. By contrast, the 
percentage of assets held in stocks slipped to 34% from 35%.

Aging baby boomers in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world also are a 
natural and growing audience for fixed-income securities, analysts 
say, because people generally shift toward more conservative 
investments as they get older.

But discussions about why money is flowing into long-term bonds 
often ignore the logical motivation, some analysts say: Investors, 
they say, must believe that the economy is slowing enough to mean 
the Fed is almost finished tightening credit.

If the Fed indeed is nearly done raising short-term rates, it 
wouldn't be unusual for long-term interest rates to be falling. 
Investors usually anticipate peaks in short rates and peaks in the 
economy and rush to lock in more attractive returns on the 
assumption that all interest rates soon will head lower, said David 
Rosenberg, an economist at Merrill Lynch. 

He believes the economy will be weak enough by 2006 for the Fed to 
begin cutting rates again.

Likewise, some experts who see lower long-term rates in the years 
ahead warn that they would most likely be accompanied by 
disappointing economic growth, which could mean poor returns on 
other investments, such as stocks, and a tough environment for job 
seekers.

Some money managers, such as Pacific Investment's Gross, favor 
relatively safe government bonds in their portfolios in large part 
because they fear what could go wrong in global markets in the next 
few years � especially with institutional investors increasingly 
pouring cash into hedge funds that pursue risky investment 
strategies using borrowed money. 

The boom in that investing style means "more systemic, systemwide 
risk," Gross said.

Greenspan on Thursday acknowledged the risks inherent in 
certain "imbalances," including the nation's mammoth trade and 
budget deficits. Yet he remained upbeat on the economy overall.

"The hypothesis that it is a weak world economy which has been 
driving down long-term interest rates is probably not correct," he 
told Congress.

Still, he could not say exactly what the cause was. Moreover, he 
said nothing to indicate that the central bank was ready to stop 
raising short-term rates.

David Malpass, an economist at brokerage Bear, Stearns & Co. in New 
York, believes that the U.S. economy is healthier than some recent 
data have suggested, and that stronger growth also will bring 
further inflation pressures � which could change the sanguine 
outlook of investors now willing to accept historically low bond 
yields, he said. Inflation eats away at fixed-rate returns.

The Fed, Malpass said, "will have to raise rates substantially 
higher on evidence of growth and inflation, and bond yields will 
rise with them."

The central bank's short-term rate could be at 4.5% by year's end, 
1.5 points above the current rate, he said.

Darda, the MKM Partners economist, also believes the Fed will 
continue to tighten credit. Someone who locks in a 10-year bond 
yield of 4% will be sorely disappointed if new bonds are paying 5% 
by year-end, he said.

Just because long-term interest rates have stayed remarkably tame 
over the last two years doesn't mean that can go on forever, Darda 
said. Many investors in the late 1990s became convinced that tech 
stocks would never fall significantly, he noted.

Now, as then, "people are making up crazy theories to justify the 
unjustifiable," he said. 







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RzSHvD/UOnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to