Building world-class capital markets 
Strong leadership is an essential ingredient.

Ralph Heidrich, Alan W. Morgan, and Gregory P. Wilson

The McKinsey Quarterly, Web exclusive, July 2005

 

http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article_page.aspx?ar=1640&L2=19&L3=67&srid=17&gp=0

How can a nation transform its capital market into a dynamic, wealth-creating 
engine for the economy or even into a financial hub?

Vital components for this effort include patient reputation building, high 
performance standards, a resilient infrastructure, and a robust regulatory 
framework. But in our experience, vision, political commitment, and, above all, 
leadership make the real difference between success and failure. Just as those 
factors frequently determine the outcome of a corporate change initiative, so 
national efforts to build or improve capital markets bear fruit only when 
someone, or perhaps a group of people, articulates the need for reform and 
implements a carefully structured program.

Too few countries, however, are capturing the value from this opportunity. We 
believe that many more of them can share in the wider economic benefits of a 
transformed capital market—if they can exhibit the sort of determined 
leadership underpinning current reform in nations as diverse as Singapore, 
Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia.

Economists agree on the value of well-functioning capital markets, yet many 
politicians and leaders still need to be convinced. The clear correlation 
between deep capital markets (as measured by bonds and equities volumes) and 
economic development (as measured by per capita GDP, for instance) needs to be 
spelled out. Other benefits of mature capital markets include better price 
discovery, faster and less costly market corrections, and the ability to hedge 
and benchmark performance on financial systems that are heavily weighted toward 
bank lending. In our view, countries whose leaders have made a concerted effort 
to promote change will have a clear advantage over many other countries that 
embark on growth strategies without a solid plan for developing their capital 
markets.

Leaders must do more than recognize the importance of well-functioning capital 
markets and quantify the proposed changes in terms of lowering the cost of debt 
or increasing participation across all investor segments. Even an understanding 
of the familiar impediments to reform (volatile and inconsistent economic 
policy, underdeveloped commercial law, the slow pace or absence of 
privatization, lack of talent, poor regulation, and inadequate pension systems, 
market makers, and infrastructure) is unlikely to be enough. Effective leaders 
must sustain the political will of the country over time—after all, a capital 
market transformation can take years to implement—and avoid the kind of reform 
fatigue that we have seen in some countries. A prolonged effort is required to 
create a virtuous upward cycle of capital market development, to introduce 
legislation, to design or redesign regulatory agencies, and to overcome inertia 
and other obstacles.

In Singapore, for example, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, then deputy governor 
of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), identified the need to develop a 
modern capital market following the 1997 financial crisis. From his position at 
MAS, he managed the policy, legal, tax, and regulatory changes that have raised 
the contribution of the capital market—and of the financial system as a 
whole—to Singapore's economy. Since then, the financial-services sector's share 
of Singapore's GDP has averaged 6.7 percent, putting it in the same league in 
2004 as the United States (7.7 percent) and above both the United Kingdom (5.7 
percent) and the European Union (5.2 percent).

Meanwhile, in Malaysia Zeti Akhtar Aziz, the governor of Bank Negara Malaysia, 
has led the way. Most recently, she championed the creation of the Islamic 
Financial Services Board, aimed at achieving the highest international 
regulatory, supervisory, and corporate-governance standards for the country. 
She also promotes Islamic finance, not only in Malaysia, but also around the 
world. As deputy governor of the central bank, Zeti was instrumental in 
developing the country's master plan to strengthen its banking sector over 
time. 

In Saudi Arabia, the latest country to recognize the need to develop its 
capital markets, a clear leader has emerged: Jammaz Al-Suhaimi, the former 
deputy governor of the central bank and now executive chairman and CEO of Saudi 
Arabia's new regulatory organization, the Capital Market Authority. An 
influential proponent of reform, he helped pass the new capital market law 
while still at the central bank and also created the CMA.

These leaders have the stature, authority, and skill to assemble teams of 
experienced professionals and build consensus among diverse interest groups. 
Moreover, each one has the credibility and experience to promote the wider 
benefits of capital market reform, thus creating a common goal for parties with 
otherwise conflicting interests.

We find that efforts to change capital markets succeed when leaders manage 
three key issues effectively.
1. Setting clear objectives
An essential first step is to define the objectives for both the market and the 
regulator. Saudi Arabia recently established clear, simple regulations covering 
the wider economic benefits of capital markets, including employment, investor 
protection, and financial stability. The CMA's development plan—including 
investment guidelines, competition safeguards, and a role for education and 
professionalism—is also a useful model.
2. Understanding the regulatory imperative
Leaders must decide, among other things, whether their country's new regulatory 
regime will be based predominantly on principles, like the United Kingdom's, or 
on rules, like Singapore's. Should institutions be allowed to fail or is some 
sort of lifeboat imaginable? An optimum legal structure also needs to be 
established at the outset. Many countries prefer to bring their existing laws 

into line with the supervisory demands of the modern market. Others, such as 
Singapore and Saudi Arabia, start with a clean slate and incorporate best 
practices from around theworld. Finally, leaders must ensure that the 
organizational design of the regulator is clearly aligned with its precise 
mission, which can include such elements as authorization, corporate finance, 
supervision and surveillance, enforcement, and investor protection.
3. Actively developing the market
Countries that simply reestablish the regulatory regime don't capture the full 
value of pro-growth reform. Successful leaders should take at least three 
steps: stimulate the development of new asset classes other than equities; 
encourage pension fund reform, such as expanding the range of assets available 
for investment, thereby attracting institutional investors; and promote 
privatization, which can stimulate capital markets by providing an IPO stream 
and by exposing inefficient enterprises to the private sector's expertise. Key 
factors for successful privatization include focusing on one clear objective at 
a time, keeping the market informed, and structuring transactions to reach 
certain target groups.

Regulators, meanwhile, should be encouraged to monitor and understand 
developments in other jurisdictions by communicating with colleagues and 
conducting regular peer reviews. Furthermore, countries can benchmark the 
progress of their capital markets against others in the region and against 
global trends. Likewise, market participants should hone their skills 
continually to meet customer needs and to improve their understanding of new 
regulatory requirements for risk management, corporate governance, compliance, 
and financial transparency.

Countries around the world increasingly understand the economic benefits of 
thriving capital markets. But financial, market, and regulatory skills alone 
are not enough to capture those benefits. Strong, visionary leaders must 
articulate the case for change and manage the transformation. 
About the Authors
Ralph Heidrich is a principal and Alan Morgan is a director in McKinsey's 
London office; Greg Wilson is a principal in the Washington, DC, office.









                
---------------------------------
Meet your soulmate!
 Yahoo! Asia presents Meetic - where millions of singles gather 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥««¤»¥«¤»§«¤»
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to