Death of marriage in Scandinavia

  By Stanley Kurtz
  Boston.Com | March 10, 2004
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/03/10/death_of_marriage_in_scandinavia/

(Stanley Kurtz is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution)

IN THE Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's dueling opinions on
same-sex marriage, each side places the burden of proof on the other.
The majority in the Goodridge decision insists there is "no rational
reason" for defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. The
minority chides the majority for its "blind faith" that there are no
potential dangers to so radical a change. Both sides lack evidence on
the real-world effects of same-sex marriage. Yet evidence is in.
Marriage is dying in Scandinavia, which has had marriage-like same-sex
registered partnerships for over a decade.

Data from European demographers and statistical bureaus show that a
majority of children in Sweden and Norway are now born out of wedlock,
as are 60 percent of first-born children in Denmark. In socially
liberal districts of Norway, where the idea of same-sex registered
partnerships is widely accepted, marriage itself has almost entirely
disappeared.

Certainly Scandinavia's system of registered partnerships is not the
only cause of marital decline. Factors like contraception, abortion,
women in the work force, individualism, secularism, and the welfare
state are also at work. These factors are weakening marriage
throughout the West. Yet scholars note that many family changes that
eventually sweep the West show up first in Scandinavia, probably
because of Scandinavia's unusually large welfare state and its notably
strong secularism.

Same-sex registered partnerships are Scandinavia's latest contribution
to Western family change -- a sharp cultural separation between the
ideas of marriage and parenthood. Even before the establishment of
registered partnerships, many Scandinavians were starting to have
their first child outside of marriage. Although the couple's
relationship was still considered experimental through the birth of
the first child, most parents did marry before the birth of the second
child.

The problem with this system is that unmarried parents break up at two
to three times the rate of married parents. So as Scandinavians
separated the ideas of marriage and parenthood, family dissolution
rates rose -- placing first-born children at particular risk. The
growing Scandinavian separation of marriage and parenthood made it
difficult to deny marriage to same-sex couples. Yet the creation of
registered partnerships has only locked in and reinforced the
separation between the ideas of marriage and parenthood, thereby
accelerating marital decline.

Same-sex registered partnerships have contributed to Scandinavian
marital decline in several ways. The controversy over registered
partnerships created a divide in Norway's Lutheran Church. The most
striking example can be found in Norway's socially liberal Nordland
County, where churches fly rainbow flags. The flags signal that clergy
in same-sex registered partnerships are welcome and that clergy who
would preach against homosexual behavior are banned. Yet only these
conservative clergy still preach against unmarried parenthood. So the
effective purge of conservative clergy from Nordland County (where
marriage is now rare) has removed a vital cultural barrier against the
practice of parental cohabitation.

For secular Scandinavians as well, same-sex registered partnerships
have reinforced the view that marriage is unrelated to parenthood.
When Sweden gave registered partners adoption rights in 2003,
supporters of the change identified the acceptance of gay adoption
with acceptance of single parenthood.

Socially conservative districts of Norway had relatively low
out-of-wedlock birthrates in the early '90s, when registered
partnerships were established. Since then, conservative districts have
seen a substantial rise in the out-of-wedlock birthrates, for both
firstborn and subsequent children. Even before the establishment of
registered partnerships, most parents in socially liberal districts,
like Norway's Nordland County, had their first child out of wedlock.
Today, not only 80 percent of first-born children in Nordland but
nearly 60 percent of subsequent children are born out of wedlock.
Clearly, in a place where de facto gay marriage has gained almost
complete acceptance, marriage itself has almost completely disappeared.

With increases in the rate of middle-class parental cohabitation,
Americans have already seen signs of the Scandinavian family pattern.
In its 2000 report "Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution," the
influential American Law Institute has proposed legal reforms that
would equalize marriage and cohabitation, Scandinavian style. By
getting Americans used to a strong separation between marriage and
parenthood, gay marriage would draw out these trends and put us firmly
on the path to the Scandinavian system. And unlike Scandinavia,
America has an underclass, whose families would suffer greatly from a
further separation between marriage and parenthood.

The core issue before the constitutional convention is the fate of the
institution of marriage. Few of us want to return to the 1950s in the
matter of homosexuality. Yet many of us also worry about the effects
on the institution of marriage of so profound a change. The
Scandinavian example shows that there are valid -- and secular --
reasons to believe that same-sex marriage will undercut marriage
itself. As the minority warned, the Supreme Judicial Court has acted
without considering the evidence. Yet it is not too late for the
people to rectify the court's mistake.










------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pkgkPB/SOnJAA/Zx0JAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to