Fuelling ‘minority complex’ among Indian Muslims
   
http://www.sulekha.com/news/nhc.aspx?cid=444834


   My good friend M J Akbar raises a question in his introduction to late Dr 
Rafiq Zakaria’s seminal book Indian Muslims: Where Have They Gone Wrong? that 
is at once fundamental and flummoxing. ‘‘At what point in the last thousand 
years,’’ he asks, ‘‘did Indian Muslims become a minority?’’ In terms of 
numbers, they have always been a minority. Muslims didn’t constitute more than 
30 per cent of India’s population even at the time of Partition. However, if 
the term ‘minority’ connotes discrimination, disempowerment and systemic 
injustice by the majority community, history gives a big jolt to our 
understanding of Muslims as a ‘minority’. 

  For did Muslims consider themselves a minority in this sense ‘‘during the 
Mughal empire’’? Or during the reign of other Muslim rulers? Akbar writes: ‘‘As 
long as Muslims felt that they were an important, and even decisive, element of 
the ruling group they did not feel that they were a minority, a term that 
implicitly condemns a community to the margins. Even a Badshah that wobbled was 
better than no Badshah at all.’’ Not that all Muslims shared power and enjoyed 
prosperity under all those strong or wobbly Muslim rulers. The socio-economic 
status of most of them was indistinguishable from that of a majority of their 
Hindu brethren. Yet, neither rich nor poor Muslims identified themselves as a 
‘minority’. 
       
 Were Muslims a ‘minority’ during the British rule? To think so is to posit 
that the Hindus felt liberated and empowered when the British enslaved India 
with the collapse of the Mughal empire. A patently absurd supposition, indeed. 
  
Let’s come to the post-Partition era, when two Muslim nations were carved out 
of what was once a united India. Did Muslims become a ‘minority’ — in the sense 
of being ‘‘condemned to the margins’’ — in the truncated, but democratic and 
secular, India? Not at all. 
  
Indian Muslims do face some Muslim-specific problems that no sensitive Hindu 
can deny. These, unfortunately, are problems arising out of history-induced 
prejudices that often colour the Hindu attitude towards Muslims, and vice 
versa. For example, I have a Muslim friend in Mumbai, a reputed professional, 
who was denied office space when the owner of the building learnt that he is a 
Muslim. But I also know of Hindu traders in mixed areas selling off their shops 
and houses to Muslims when their neighbourhood started to become predominantly 
Muslim. This kind of segregation bodes ill for social harmony and national 
integration. But the point to note is that there is nothing either in India’s 
socio-religious ethos or in our Constitution and laws that legitimises unjust 
and discriminatory treatment of Muslims. 
   
  Sadly, a systematic effort has been underway to create and sustain a minority 
syndrome among Indian Muslims, persuading them to believe that they have been 
wronged in post-1947 India. Pakistan’s ruling establishment aided this 
propaganda for several decades after Partition because this notion indirectly 
justified the creation of Pakistan as a separate Muslim nation. (Akbar mentions 
how the Muslim League leadership ‘‘turned a minority complex into a separate 
nation’’.) But what is astounding, even alarming, is that some of our own 
parties, solely with an eye on Muslim votes, seek to keep the ‘minority 
complex’ alive among Indian Muslims, thus perpetuating the pernicious notion of 
India as a nation that is an uneasy admixture of a majority and a minority. 
   
  Examples, old and recent, abound — religion-based reservation for Muslims; 
legislative and administrative protection to Bangladeshi infiltrators in Assam; 
Muslim census in the Armed Forces; and the UPA Government’s proposed 15-point 
programme for minorities, with a dubious provision for population-based 
minority quota in government spending (something like ‘Muslim Budgeting’ on the 
lines of ‘Gender Budgeting’). All these are designed to convey a simple message 
to Indian Muslims: ‘‘Yes, you are separate. You are discriminated against. You 
are unsafe. We alone will protect you. Therefore, vote for us.’’ 
   
  This kind of dishonest wooing of Muslims as a ‘permanent minority’ hasn’t 
benefited Muslim masses. Instead, it has led to three undesirable consequences. 
It has strengthened the hands of communal forces in Muslim society. It has 
prejudiced and further communalised the mindset of a section of Hindus, who 
already harbour many negative perceptions about Islam and Muslims. Thirdly, at 
the political level, the perversion of secularism for the sake of Muslim votes 
has made parties like the BJP, which are constantly dubbed anti-Muslim by its 
opponents, ignore Indian Muslims’ legitimate concerns, thereby alienating them. 
   
  Dr Zakaria, a great patriot who spent his entire political life as a devoted 
Congressman, has this to say in his book: ‘‘After Independence, Indian Muslims 
became a pawn in the hands of political parties and were manoeuvred merely to 
obtain their votes. This so angered the communal Hindus that they mounted an 
India-wide pro-Hindu and anti-Muslim campaign.’’ He remained committed to the 
ideal of Hindu-Muslim unity throughout his life. But he was a sad man when he 
passed away in July last year, pained by the divisive and confrontational 
nature of Indian politics, disillusioned by the unprincipled conduct of his own 
party, and heartbroken by Muslim politics in India both before and after 
Partition. That pain and sadness showed on his face in his last TV appearance, 
a panel discussion (in which I too participated) on the Jinnah debate triggered 
by L K Advani’s Pakistan visit. 
   
  Hence, this column is a belated but heartfelt tribute to someone I deeply 
admired and frequently interacted with. It’s appropriate to close it by 
recalling Dr Zakaria’s sane words: ‘‘A gigantic effort is now needed to check 
and replace the present divisive pattern of politics by a broadbased common 
brotherhood, which does not recognise any distinction of caste and creed.’’ 
  
write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

                
---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
 PhotoMail  - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.




--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to