Meanwhile: No massage, thank you, Mr. President.  

Joan Vennochi | The Boston Globe  | July 24, 2006

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/24/opinion/edvenn.php


The look on her face said it all. Angela Merkel was not happy. The 
German chancellor, the only woman at a gathering of powerful world 
leaders, was the unwilling recipient of a quick neck massage at the 
hands of President George W. Bush.
 
The scene, which played out at the Group of 8 summit meeting in St. 
Petersburg, became an Internet sensation, mostly because of Merkel's 
reaction. The chancellor hunches her shoulders, throws up her arms, 
and flashes a look of utter dismay. Women everywhere feel her 
discomfort.
 
The incident made international news. One German tabloid headlined 
it "Bush: Love Attack on Merkel." Since everything is now fair game 
for partisan attack, the presidential neck rub also fired up Bush 
critics at home. On the ultra-liberal Huffington Post, author Steve 
Young dubbed Bush "lounge-lizard in chief" and deplored the 
president's initiation of "an inappropriate and unrequested back 
rub."
 
That extreme level of Bush-bashing makes liberals look silly. After 
all, it's impossible to talk about presidents and sexual harassment 
without mentioning Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.
 
In that case, the president of the United States had sexual 
relations with a White House intern. Lewinsky never took it to 
court; but courts have ruled that sexual harassment can occur even 
if both participants are willing. It's the power differential that 
counts.
 
The quickie neck rub was something different.
 
Photos from the summit show Bush touching Merkel's hand and the 
chancellor laughing. Then Bush definitely crossed a familiarity line.
 
If you are pro-Bush, you say it is a natural outgrowth of his 
informal, regular-guy persona. If you're anti-Bush, you say it is a 
product of his frat-boy cluelessness.
 
As it happens, this interaction between two heads of state put an 
international spotlight on a fact of life for working women.
 
You can spend a career perfecting your handshake and still be 
startled by a man who suddenly invades your personal space with 
unexpected intimacy in a professional setting. This is a nonpartisan 
observation. Trust me, Democrats do it, too.
 
The oft-quoted Larry Sabato, professor of politics at the University 
of Virginia, told the Associated Press, "almost any male alive today 
knows that you don't offer uninvited massages to any female, much 
less the chancellor of Germany."
 
But the truth is: Touching happens; usually it isn't caught on 
video. The challenge is figuring out how to handle it.
 
Most working mothers can probably recollect at least one unsolicited 
belly pat during pregnancy. Beyond pregnancy, there's the unforeseen 
kiss of greeting, instead of the expected hand grip; the arm that 
reaches out, draws you in, and squeezes a welcome; and the fingers 
on the back of the neck, kneading, in Bush-like fashion.
 
In the workplace, if a superior - male or female - engages in 
unwelcome touching, a case can be made for sexual harassment. A CEO 
runs the risk of losing his job for such behavior.
 
In Boston, one recently did. Robert Haddad was recently forced to 
resign as head of the Caritas Christi Health Care System over 
allegations that he sexually harassed several female employees. The 
charges involved incidents where he allegedly kissed women on the 
lips; Haddad said it was a custom of his Lebanese upbringing.
 
But as with Bush and Merkel, an incident can involve professional 
equals who do not work for the same company or government. And when 
it happens, at a G-8 summit or a business conference, the 
interaction does not routinely lend itself to a lawsuit.
 
You turn away from the lips, push the arm away, move away from the 
hands on your neck. Your reaction depends on how well you know the 
man lunging your way, and the overall context in which it occurs.
 
Is it a mostly innocent, if socially boorish, version of the male-to-
male, locker-room towel snap? Or, is it a way to demean and 
patronize, to change the equation by neutralizing the woman's power 
so it is no longer a case of two professional equals?
 
Some say that's what Bush was doing, but it doesn't look that way to 
me. In either case, is it best to dodge it with a joke? Or, do you 
offer a frosty put- down and act like a humorless you- know-what?
 
There is always the Merkel option: Just grimace and bear it.
 
Joan Vennochi's column appears regularly in The Boston Globe.  









--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to