Degeneration of modern nations into tribalism 

Hywel Williams | The Hindu | August 25, 2006

http://www.hindu.com/2006/08/25/stories/2006082504161100.htm


MODERN GOVERNMENTS, when they try to justify their existence in 
historical terms, are apt to propose a rough-and-ready anthropology 
for human development. First came the tribe — savage in instinct, 
ritualistic in religion, and run on the basis of a grunting 
solidarity; humanity's first exercise in collectivism. The nation, 
which takes its place, is far more refined, literate peoples, and 
can call upon scholars and scribes, chroniclers and preachers, who 
propose common goals for the nation. 

Organised states, with their bureaucracies, sanitation services and 
taxation policies, like to think that they exist on a higher plane 
than either the tribe or the nation. Ethics loom large and 
morality's plans acquire a finer focus. Modern governments are meant 
to promote the fulfilment of individuals, their happiness and ease 
of life. Savages have become citizens and can look beyond the narrow 
ambitions of the tribe. 

Nations continue to exist within the modern democratic state. But 
elections in such societies are won on the basis of economic plans 
which persuade individuals that their futures will be healthier and 
more interesting under one dispensation than another. In that 
calculus, being a better patriot hardly makes an appearance and 
often the politician draped in the flag is an object of suspicion. 

Ancient loyalties subsist 


A summer of Middle Eastern battles is a reminder of how precarious 
this genealogy is and how the ancient loyalties still subsist. 
Hizbollah and Hamas are tribes that have flourished because of the 
breakdown of state authority in Lebanon and the failure of the 
Palestinian Authority to exercise any kind of state order. Hands 
outstretched in collective salute, the members of these tribes are 
reminiscent of western Europe's last tribal moment, the fascism of 
the 1930s. In both cases there is the use of religion to promote a 
tribal solidarity. 

Israel itself is no less tribal an affair than its opponents. The 
secular state and socialist values have long since disappeared from 
its history. It was always a quixotic idea that the nationalist 
theory of Zionism could be successfully transplanted from the 
European political tradition of the 19th century to the Middle East 
of the 20th century. Israel has simply degenerated into its context. 

Within Europe the tribe has become one of the key features of the 
21st century. The continent's last great east-to-west movement of 
the displaced was in the wreckage of the post-1945 world. That 
Volkerwanderung has returned in the wreckage of the Warsaw Pact. 
Russia's revival as a great power has been a renaissance, first, in 
Slavic consciousness. The Russia built by Peter the Great looked to 
the Western tradition of state-building, but the country now run by 
Vladimir Putin looks both to its Slavic roots and to its own 
embodiment as the home of the tribe and people of Rus. 

Even the world's last superstate shows features of tribal activity 
at work in the age of George W. Bush. America's politicised form of 
evangelicalism is uninterested in the ideals of common democratic 
purpose. Its religion is that of the tribe at work and at worship — 
promoting its own solidarity. Having retreated within its own cultic 
view of the world, it then imposes its views on others — as in the 
case of the presidential ban on stem-cell research. 

Middle Eastern tribalism, just like the African variety, is the 
direct result of colonial interference which frustrated the 
indigenous development of state-building. Ruled from above — often 
through regimes lacking popular legitimacy — peoples retreat 
naturally to the tribe, which offers solidarity and hope. 

Tribalism in Europe has more to do with the failure of the 
governmental project in the late 20th century. France has failed to 
absorb its Muslim minority, who are drawn to ever more tribal 
loyalties. British tribalism has taken its cue from the degeneration 
of welfarist aspiration into a bureaucratic exercise. Here the moral 
case for taxation in terms of human progress seems so implausible 
that it is rarely presented, and "wars on waste" come and go, 
achieving little. 

Flirtation with English tribalism represents an attempt at breathing 
new life into ancient conflicts in a world of devolved government — 
as with the Tory proposal to ban Welsh and Scottish MPs from voting 
on legislation with an exclusively English application. This is an 
old game of division and separation. Genetic research has shown how, 
within 15 generations of their fifth- to seventh-century arrival, 
the genes of the Anglo-Saxons had multiplied so successfully that 
they accounted for more than half the male DNA in the population of 
England. Most probably through enforced segregation and a ban on 
intermarriage, the invading tribes had isolated the native British 
tribes in order to create a new, Germanicised country. Early 
medieval history has become the best guide to our age of the decay 
of states and the degeneration of nations into tribal 
attitudinising. — 

© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006













--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to