Using rape as a weapon

Diane King* | International Herald Tribune | July 8, 2007

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/08/opinion/edking.php


Iraq's diverse cultures share a way of understanding the family,
 "patriliny," in which identities ranging from religion to ethnicity
to clan are conferred by fathers alone, not mothers. Understanding
patriliny can help shed light on inter-group conflict in Iraq,
specifically on the inter-sectarian rapes and killings  that take
place every day.


In the cultural logic of patriliny, a child receives social and legal
 categories from his or her father. The child of a Kurdish mother
and an Arab father, for example, is regarded as 100  percent Arab.


There are not any Iraqis who are legally regarded as belonging to two
 different parentally conferred categories. The categories are thus
 sealed off from each other by the conventions of kinship, and there
are no people who share multiple categories. While that alone might
be regarded as giving rise to the perfect inter-sectarian storm, it
is not the only facet of patriliny that may contribute to conflict.


In the kind of patriliny found in Iraq, procreation is imagined via a
 seed and soil metaphor. During ethnographic research I have carried
out  since 1995, Iraqi Kurds have explained to me their understanding
 that, during sex, a man "plants a seed" in a woman. This seed is
then nurtured in the "soil" of the womb. Only the seed is seen to
contribute the essence of the child. I once heard it explained by a
proponent of this cultural theory that a child who bears resemblance
to his or her mother is a product of a seed that failed to fend off
permeation by some of the soil during gestation. This could lead, I
was told, to ridicule of the child's father for producing weak seed.


Rape is always humiliating, always a violation, always awful. But
under patrilineal  cultures, it can also be a tool of sectarian
discord and even genocide.  This is the case  in Iraq, where rape is
frequently used as a weapon of sectarian conflict.  When a Shiite
militiaman rapes a Sunni woman, for example, he is seen as
potentially implanting a Shiite individual into her womb. He is
causing her to suffer dual humiliations: She is sexually violated,
with all of the personal implications that that would carry in any
culture. But the rape further serves like a Trojan Horse: hereafter,
an offspring bearing the rapist's identity may well be hidden inside
her body, an enemy who will emerge in nine
 months.


So cross-sectarian rape as a weapon of political conflict
 hypothetically can force a woman to nurture her own enemy. But in
actual practice, this rarely happens. Rather, the tragedy of rape is
compounded when a member of that woman's group eliminates her and
any enemy offspring through an "honor killing." Honor killings are
usually carried out by the father or brother of the victim,
although  they may be committed by others from the group.
Alternatively, the woman herself may commit an "honor suicide."


Honor killings have been on the rise in Iraq. The connection these
 killings have to a corresponding rise in rapes has not been
documented, but there seems to be every reason to assume a
connection.


Women are not the only ones whose victimization in warfare takes on
 richer meaning in light of patriliny. In patrilineal logic, a man
is not simply an individual with the ability to wage conflict; he is
the sole bearer of seed, the sowing of which adds  greater strength
to his group. A man who is killed is eliminated from producing any
further members of his group.


In patriliny, the stage is set for one patrilineal group to inflict
 maximum harm on another: Rape the women, and thereby inflict one of
the awful options of bearing enemy children or killing their own.
Kill the men, and thereby eliminate not only combatants, but those
with power to produce more members of the enemy. No people  with
hybrid identities exist.


Inter-group enmity driven by patrlineal logic has already given rise
to genocidal conflict from Bosnia to Rwanda, Kosovo to Darfur. Iraq
may already justifiably be placed on this list. Who will speak up
for the victims? All those in power in Iraq bear a responsibility to
stop the madness.


*Diane E. King, a cultural anthropologist whose research focuses on
 Iraqi Kurdistan, is a fellow with the Howard Foundation of Brown
 University and a researcher at Washington State University.</em>






Reply via email to