Pakistan's Institutions and Civil Society

Jayshree Bajoria | Council on Foreign Relations | 27 December 2007

http://www.cfr.org/publication/14731/pakistans_institutions.html?breadcrumb=%2Findex


Introduction
Pakistan's army and its intelligence agency, the Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI), have long been on top of the power structure in
the country. Through coups, support of militants, and interference
in their neighboring countries' affairs, they have directly or
indirectly held onto power and been at the center of major decision
making in the country since its creation in August 1947. Militant
Islamic groups are the other powerful players, sometimes standing on
the same side as the government, as in the case of jihadis trained
and recruited to fight wars in Kashmir and Afghanistan, and
sometimes against the government—as with those challenging Gen.
Pervez Musharraf's rule today.

As Pakistan's president and its army chief, Musharraf has targeted
the country's judiciary as specifically as he has extremists in his
justification of the imposition of emergency rule in November 2007.
One of the first steps Musharraf took under emergency rule was to
replace Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who he had
initially tried to dismiss in March 2007. Musharraf then moved to
crack down on the media, lawyers, social activists, and secular and
religious political opponents. Who are these emerging players in
Pakistani society and how do they fit in the power dynamics of a
state dominated by the military?

Supreme Court and the Judiciary
The chief justice of the supreme court is appointed by the
president. According to the Pakistani Constitution, the judiciary is
separate from the executive and is set up as an independent
authority to uphold the rule of law. The supreme court stands at the
apex of the country's judicial systems; it has wide jurisdiction,
which includes the ability to issue pronouncements on issues it
considers of public importance with reference to the enforcement of
any of the fundamental rights. These include the right to life and
liberty, the right to freedom of speech and expression, the right to
fair trial, and the right to equality among others.

There is a high court in each of the four provinces, and there are
other courts that exercise civil and criminal jurisdiction. Pakistan
also has a Federal Shariat Court comprising eight Muslim judges,
including a chief justice appointed by the president. Cases
involving interpretation of Islam are referred to this court. Legal
scholar Paula R. Newberg notes in her book, Judging the State:
Courts and Constitutional Politics in Pakistan, that Pakistan's
courts and judges are cast as protectors of the constitution in a
separation-of-powers system. In many circumstances, however, they
have found it expedient or necessary to accommodate constitutional
changes or unconstitutional maneuvers by Pakistan's leaders. They
have done so either because they thought this was essential to their
own survival or that of the state. On three occasions when military
coups ousted democratically elected governments in the country, "the
judiciary not only failed to check extra-constitutional regime
change, but also endorsed and abetted the consolidation of illegally
gained power," says an International Crisis Group report. Newberg
argues that over time, this has weakened the rule of law and given
the government leeway for ever-more repressive action.

In November 2007, Chaudhry and several other supreme court judges
refused to sign Musharraf's decision to suspend the constitution and
rule by decree. "This is unprecedented in Pakistan's history," says
Hassan Abbas, research fellow at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of
Government. Abbas points out that Chaudhry, through his suo moto
(acting on his own initiative) actions, has demanded greater
accountability for bureaucrats, police, and even the intelligence
agencies, something that was inconceivable in Pakistan before him.
He also gained support of Pakistan's lawyers, who are one of the
best networked communities in the country, able to reach deep into
rural areas. But the ICG report writes that the executive "exercises
control over the courts by using the system of judicial
appointments, promotions and removals to ensure its allies fill key
posts." Hence Musharraf's replacement of Chaudhry, along with other
judges, is not, in itself, illegal.

Civil Society Organizations
Civil society in Pakistan comprises nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs), community-based organizations, think tanks, trade unions,
cultural groups, and informal citizen organizations. In 2001,
Civicus, an international alliance of civil society groups,
described Pakistan's civil society (PDF) as a " collection of
incoherent voices, conflicting worldviews and opposing interests"
characterized by "unresolved struggle between the practices and
values of pre-capitalist society and new modes of social life,
between authoritarian legacies, and democratic aspirations."
According to the report, there are:

10,000 to 12,000 active and registered NGOs in Pakistan. Of these,
59 percent are in Punjab province.
Up to sixty thousand NGOs if unregistered groups are counted.
Eight thousand trade unions
Six different laws under which NGOs have to be registered
Because the political space afforded to civil society organizations
is limited, these organizations have limited impact on policymaking
and implementation. But Abbas says they are increasingly emerging as
an important group. "Every time there is a crackdown by government
or the military, these activists are the first to be rounded up.
This means the military is challenged by them," he says.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan is one of the leading
organizations fighting for human rights and democratic development
in the country. It has loudly condemned the questionable practices
of the military and political parties. Hina Jilani, the UN secretary
general's first special representative on human rights defenders in
2000, Asma Jahangir, UN special rapporteur of the UN Human Rights
Commission,  and I.A. Rehman, director of the Human Rights
Commission of Pakistan, are well-known names in Pakistan who have
gained prominence in the international community. They derive power
from their high international profiles and alliances to
international civil-society organizations.

Political Organizations
Pakistan has more than ninety registered political parties covering
a broad spectrum, from ethnic-based to religious to secular. The
major parties are:

Pakistan People's Party (PPP). Founded by former Prime Minister
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in 1967, the PPP was headed by his daughter
Benazir Bhutto until her assassination on December 27, 2007. The
party has been in power thrice. Benazir Bhutto's government was
removed twice on charges of corruption and mismanagement, and her
return to Pakistan in October 2007 occurred as part of an amnesty
deal to lift the threat of arrest.
Pakistan's Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N). PML inherited the legacy of
the Muslim League, the party which dominated the pre-1947 struggle
for the creation of Pakistan on the basis of a separate homeland for
Indian Muslims. It split into several branches, the most prominent
being PML-Nawaz and PML-Quaid-e-Azam. PML-N is headed by a former
prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, and represents the business,
industrial, and feudal interests in the country. Sharif, like his
rival Bhutto, faces charges of corruption and an effort to return to
Pakistan in autumn 2007 led to his immediate deportation.
Pakistan's Muslim League-Quaid-e-Azam (PML-Q). This faction emerged
after Sharif's exile, and is now seen as the most powerful PML
faction. PML-Q has supported Musharraf's government.
Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM). The most influential ethnic party,
MQM represents the muhajirs, or those who migrated from India to
Pakistan in 1947. Founded in 1978 and originally called the Muhajir
Qaumi Movement, the party renamed itself the Muttahida Qaumi
Movement in the 1990s. MQM remains the most powerful political force
in the major urban centre of Sindh.
Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA). A coalition of religious parties such
as Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) and Jamiat Ulema-
e-Pakistan, the MMA runs the government in North West Frontier
Province and is part of a coalition in Balochistan with PML-Q. The
party is strongly opposed to the "war on terror" and has deep ties
with the Taliban both in Pakistan and Afghanistan. However, the MMA
has, at times, reached accomodations with Musharraf's government.
Even though there are a huge number of political parties in the
country, the class base for most parties has failed to move beyond
the traditional elite (Wikipedia maintains a reasonably accurate
listing of minor parties). CFR Senior Fellow Daniel Markey says
Pakistan is still a very top-down society "where a small elite sits
above a massive base, and the inequalities of power and
opportunities are extreme." Linked to personalities rather than
ideologies, Markey says Pakistan's parties are institutionally weak
and have not been able to respond to the needs of their constituents.

Internal power struggles in the absence of party elections have
frequently led to the fragmentation of political parties, adding to
the increasing number of political groups present in the country.
Moreover, "in terms of ideology," writes the Human Rights Commission
of Pakistan, "the major political parties have been moving closer
towards each other, and generally steering away from agendas
advocating radical social change."

Religious Groups
Besides religious political parties, local religious militant
organizations operate in and significantly influence the country.
According to Abbas, two dozen or so armed religious extremist
groups, most of them officially banned, still operate either
underground or under new names. Some of these groups consider
themselves freedom fighters and are focused on Kashmir, others want
to make Pakistan a theocratic state, and others have sectarian
goals. Most of these groups benefit from sanctuary in the Federally
Administered Tribal Areas, where militants often have strong links
with the Taliban. Abbas says that while supporting these
organizations to wage its proxy wars in other countries, "the
Pakistani government and military forgot that these groups had their
own other agendas as well." These groups have long been part of
Pakistan's foreign policy agenda, but Abbas argues that unless the
Pakistani government curbs these local militants, as well as foreign
and Taliban-linked extremists, the country "faces the prospect of
increasing turmoil and instability."

Besides these groups, there are people within the government,
military, professional institutions, and even within the secular
political parties who are religious and who believe in the
establishment of a more conservative and religious society.

Media Organizations
Pakistan has a history of vibrant, private, and independent print
media such as English language newspapers, Dawn, The Frontier Post,
Daily Times, The Friday Times, The News, and Urdu language
newspapers like the Jang and Daily Khabrain. But print media cannot
serve as mass media in a country where more than half the population
is illiterate. With only 47 percent literacy (PDF), compared to an
average of 60 percent in South Asia, Pakistan's newspapers fail to
reach a significant segment of population, especially in the rural
areas. While newspapers inform the educated in urban areas, in rural
Pakistan, people have long depended on radio and state-run
telelvision channels for information in the absence of any private
broadcast media in the country.

But eight years ago, after assuming power, Musharraf changed the
landscape for private broadcast media in the country. A range of
television, and radio outlets, as well as Internet sites, opened up
as more and more private players won licenses to operate. Now Geo TV
network, ARY-TV, and AAJ TV compete with state run news channels.

On The Media, a weekly National Public Radio program, described the
changes Musharraf wrought as a cultural breakthrough. Freelance
journalist Shahan Mufti told On The Media that until Musharraf
opened up the media, "Pakistanis were used to being told things
through the state media." But now after private news channels
started operating, "it allowed all sorts of voices of all political
persuasion to appear on TV." But the new and young broadcast media
came into conflict with its creator in March 2007. The media showed
live coverage of events as they unfolded when Musharraf tried to
sack former Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, stirring up
such public outcry against the decision that the president had to
revert back and reinstate the judge. As Hamid Mir, executive editor
of Geo TV, tells the Columbia Journalism Review, "a few years ago
you could have said, `If it weren't for Musharraf, private
television wouldn't be where it is.' Today there is no doubt—if it
weren't for private television, General Musharraf wouldn't be in the
mess that he is in." Soon after the chief justice event, Musharraf
ordered a crackdown on GeoTV but that too was broadcasted live.
Mufti says the government finally realized "breaking news had a huge
effect on mobilizing people" and introduced new laws with
restrictions on live coverage.

The growth of private broadcast media has been accompanied by
increased "momentum of coercion, violence and intimidation against
media," states a 2006 report by the journalism watchdog group
Internews Pakistan. According to the report, there has been a
dramatic increase in the level of violence and intimidation against
journalists and media organizations. Government authorities have
arrested dozens of journalists, banned publications, shut down radio
stations, raided presses, brought charges against journalists, and
kept journalists out of certain territories, particularly the tribal
areas.

Musharraf pulled the plug on all independent news channels after
declaring emergency. Speaking on NPR, Mufti says that free media and
the expectations of people in the most remote villages linked to it
for information "has really become the backbone for the democratic
movement in this country. It will be a very hard process to roll
back."

Stock Market and the Economy
After seizing power in a coup in 1999, Musharraf undertook economic
reforms, including fiscal adjustment; privatization of energy,
telecommunications, and production; banking sector reform; and trade
reform. According to economists, these have played a key role in the
country's economic recovery. The World Bank says that external
factors—such as low interest rates, increased external assistance,
and debt restructuring—also played a role. After 9/11, increased
remittances and additional support from the United States helped
increase the country's external reserves. Since 2003, the economy
has grown by more than 6.5 percent per year and poverty has declined
significantly.

The main stock index has risen more than 1,000 percent since the end
of 2001. Despite some of the worst unrest in years, the economy has
continued to hum. The United States is the largest investor in
Pakistan, accounting for nearly one-third of the country's foreign
direct investment from July 2007 to September 2007, according to
Pakistan's ministry of finance.

CFR's Markey says the success of the financial markets and the
expansion of the economy under Musharraf has been fundamental to his
staying power. By keeping their money in Pakistan, investors—both
domestic and international—continue to prop up the government. "It's
a vote of confidence that's come out of the capital markets," says
Markey.


Reply via email to