Pretending to Prevent Conflict

Bhaskar Menon | undiplomaticblogspot.com | 08 February 2008

http://undiplomatictimes.blogspot.com/2008/02/pretending-to-prevent-conflict.html


The ringing preamble of the United Nations Charter committed the
organization to "save succeeding generations from the scourge of war," but so 
far, it's been a worthless pledge. About a hundred million people, most of them 
black, brown and yellow, were killed by the proxy conflicts of the "Cold War" 
(a term utterly racist in its premise but one that continues to be used without 
embarrassment or explanation).

The killing has continued after the end of East-West confrontation
under the rubric of "ancient ethnic hatreds" (the Balkans), tribalism
(which seems to affect only resource-rich regions in Africa), and
"jihadist Islam" (rooted in Muslim countries but justifying the global "war on 
terror"). The death toll has been horrific. In just the last decade in the 
Democratic Republic of the Congo some four million people have been killed in a 
proxy war over resources.

The United Nations has been a bystander to this continuing carnage, its 
peacekeeping and humanitarian roles underlining its core failure to prevent 
war. In the late 1990s, when that failure became uncomfortably salient amidst 
the dashed hopes of post-Cold War peace, there was a great beating about in the 
diplomatic bush and a resolution was procured in 1998 on "conflict prevention." 
There was much talk of "early warning" mechanisms -- as if the suddenness of 
developments was a major reason for lack of preventive action -- and of "rapid 
response." A number of the middle Powers began to train troops ready for 
assembly into formed units for deployment at short notice.

Ever since the 1998 resolution, the Secretary-General has submitted periodic 
reports apprising the Security Council of developments. I have just finished 
reading the latest of these, and can report that we stand in no danger of 
seeing the UN become suddenly effective in preventing conflict. The 17-page 
document begins with an upbeat statement:

"A culture of prevention is taking hold at the United Nations; awareness of the 
importance of prevention has spread, and the commitment to building and 
mainstreaming its tools has taken root. Progress is being made in strengthening 
the Organization’s ability to respond to disputes or situations that might lead 
to violence and to address the root causes of conflict. Efforts are under way 
to strengthen the Organization’s conflict-prevention mechanisms and 
instruments, with a view to making them a core component of the collective 
security architecture of the United Nations."

After that obligatory feel-good statement, the report does a slow jig towards 
reality (or what passes for it at the UN), and winds up with: "However, despite 
the increased recognition of the utility and effectiveness of preventive 
measures, a considerable gap remains between rhetoric and reality." It explains 
why: "Conflict prevention is a multidimensional task involving political, 
humanitarian, development and other measures tailored to each specific context."

To address that complex undertaking the United Nations is "developing 
increasingly multifaceted approaches to the prevention of conflicts, drawing on 
the cooperation of many different actors, including Member States; 
international, regional and subregional organizations; the private sector; 
non-governmental organizations; and other civil society actors." There are no 
specifics about what is being done, but we are assured that:

"This comprehensive approach includes structural prevention efforts to address 
the root causes of conflict; operational prevention to ensure the effectiveness 
of early warning mechanisms, mediation, humanitarian access and response, the 
protection of civilians, and targeted sanctions in the face of immediate 
crises; and systemic prevention to prevent existing conflicts from spilling 
over into other States."

There is not a word about who supplies the arms that make African conflicts 
possible, or who profits from them. Most of the weaponry comes from other 
regions, especially Europe; the resources looted under cover of war also flow 
to other regions. Africa is being subjected to colonialism by other means.

While addressing "situations of hardship, deprivation, difficulty and 
inequality, which breed war, is not new to the United Nations," the report 
says, the Organization has recognized "that these different approaches must be 
linked so as to create a comprehensive conflict-prevention strategy." That "has 
allowed for a more holistic and systemized approach to the maintenance of 
international peace and security and international collective security 
mechanisms."

The actions envisaged in the report are all of that nebulous variety, with one 
exception: the Department of Political Affairs is being "strengthened" to cope 
with the manifold and multidimensional tasks of prevention. In short, more jobs 
for the boys.


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com



--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to