What Obama needs in his secretary of state

International Herald Tribune | November 20, 2008

http://www.iht.com//articles/2008/11/20/opinion/edclinton.php?
WT.mc_id=newsalert



Speculation that Barack Obama may appoint Hillary Clinton as 
secretary of state has induced reams of commentary on their personal 
compatibility, Bill Clinton's income sources, and historical 
precedents for a cabinet of rivals. But these are peripheral matters 
that obscure the real requirements for the next secretary of state.

Obama is now deciding upon the person who will carry out a dramatic 
change of direction in American foreign policy. This ought to be a 
moment for a serious public conversation about the qualities needed 
at this precarious juncture.

The nation's top diplomat must be someone who is known to have the 
complete confidence of the president. Whatever mistakes she may have 
made, when Condoleezza Rice spoke to a foreign head of state her 
interlocutors understood that she spoke for the president. The same 
was true of James Baker when he served as secretary of state for the 
first President Bush.

Baker also had another crucial quality: He treated diplomacy as a 
political art. Forging compromises is an indispensable component of 
statecraft that the current President Bush for too long disdained.

If Obama wants to undo the damage, he will need a secretary of state 
who can sit down with Russia's foreign minister and negotiate trade-
offs that suit the interests of each side. The next secretary will 
also have to be capable of venturing into the Iranian bazaar to 
explore a grand bargain with Tehran involving not only Iran's nuclear 
program, but also stability in Iraq, security in the Gulf region, and 
Iran's sponsorship of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. And 
since Obama wants to plunge into peacemaking between Palestinians and 
Israel in his first year, his vicar for foreign policy must be 
someone who inspires confidence in both parties yet is tough enough 
to elicit needed compromises from both.

Last but not least, the nation's foreign service needs a dynamic 
manager who can breathe new life into a demoralized and underfunded 
organization.

Perhaps Obama is confident that Clinton has all these qualities. But 
he shouldn't appoint her - or anyone else - to this vital post until 
he is sure his nominee is capable of reviving a much-diminished State 
Department.



Reply via email to