2011/11/16 Gaetano Giunta <giunta.gaet...@gmail.com> > Daniel Fahlke wrote: > >> 2011/11/16 Derick Rethans<der...@apache.org> >> >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> >>> Guys, >>>> >>>> we have missed a report. >>>> >>> Hmm, I didn't see a reminder notice at all actually. I wonder why not? >>> >>> In addition I don't see very much activity on this podling. >>>> >>>> Are there still active people in this project? If so, please speak up. >>>> >>> Sortofish... we are really small, and it seems we got a bit more on our >>> plate since the code was donated. As far as I know, the project is right >>> now mostly in "support" mode rather than "let's write lots of new code". >>> >>> Maybe somebody else has a different opinion? >>> >>> cheers, >>> Derick >>> >>> -- >>> http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org >>> Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php >>> twitter: @derickr and @xdebug >>> >>> the last reminder i got, was August 2011 >> >> But yeah, its not as active here as planed. Most people have more to do >> with work and related currently. >> >> I think too, that this project is already in "support" mode, but that we >> were not able to make a release yet is nothing good. We should at least >> now >> removing all blocking Tickets for this. >> > Fully agree. I have no idea how many people are on the list, but it seems > most of them are in "sleeping mode", ie. have little time to devote to the > project, except for the bugfix of their interest. > To the outside world, the fact that there has been no release since the > migration is not good pr. > Maybe if there was one, we could start at least a bit of an ad campaign. > >> the second thing i noticed. We need some plan for people who want >> contribute new components. In best case someone, who guide them throught >> the whole process and send them to the right place and person, if >> questions >> occur. >> >> For outsiders it often looks, like we are not interested in new >> components, >> this should change. >> > Agree here too (see my recent post about a webservices-client component, > that gathered only 1 response so far). > > Also, we should start a review of components that miss a maintainer, and > make it more clear who the maintainer is for each one, so that > responsibilities are better delineated, and possibly people get more > committed. > And maybe have a kind of "board" made of components maintainers that takes > decisions about release dates and similar topics? > > Bye > Gaetano >
Hi, Same for me. Not such time for this, but in touch to sell a Zeta Components powered soft. I'm waiting for business. Have we done some concurrency comparison to find a good idea of missing component ? Cheers, -- Maxime maxime.tho...@wascou.org | www.wascou.org | http://twitter.com/wascou
