Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 10:10:31PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I'm working on getting the most recent ZFS to the FreeBSD's CVS. Because >> of the huge amount of changes, I decided to work on ZFS regression >> tests, so I'm more or less sure nothing broke in the meantime. > [...] >
Thanks I've opened the following bug for this problem and the other inconsistencies you reported a few weeks ago. 6704508 zfs inconsistencies discovered by FreeBSD testsuite. -Mark > Below you can find another inconsistency: > > # zpool create test mirror <disk0> <disk1> > # zpool export test > Remove <disk1> and put a new one in the same place. > # zpool import test > # zpool status test > pool: test > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is > missing or > invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue > functioning in a degraded state. > action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'. > see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-4J > scrub: resilver completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Sun May 18 > 16:58:29 2008 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > test ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 > <disk0> ONLINE 0 0 0 > 3072748155191203922 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 was <disk1> > > errors: No known data errors > > Note the pool is reported to be in ONLINE state, instead of DEGRADED state. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-code mailing list > zfs-code at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-code
