Unfortunately, I don't think that the send stream would help us diagnose it 
further.  What we really need is a way to reproduce how to get into this 
situation in the first place.

--matt

Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> There is a bug (6709336), which was closed with 'Not Reproducible' reason, but
> I've a file system over here, where it is easy to reproduce.  Dmitry (fs 
> owner)
> send me a snapshot of it (zfs send output) and I can reproduce it at will 
> after
> doing 'ls' in one of the directories.
> 
> It looks like there are three entires in directory that are duplicated.
> 
> After adding this patch, so it stops panicing:
> 
>       http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zap_micro.c.2.patch
> 
> and some more debug we can see something like this:
> 
>  mzap_open: obj=6108
> mze_insert: i=00: adding mze_name=[daily.20080701.gz] 
> hash=16887356416216530944
> mze_insert: i=01: adding mze_name=[daily.20080702.gz] 
> hash=14729145520459087872
> mze_insert: i=02: adding mze_name=[daily.20080703.gz] 
> hash=15098007138724741120
> mze_insert: i=03: adding mze_name=[daily.20080704.gz] hash=9227684390178390016
> mze_insert: i=04: adding mze_name=[daily.20080705.gz] 
> hash=11376611903104090112
> mze_insert: i=05: adding mze_name=[daily.20080706.gz] 
> hash=13533957483210473472
> mze_insert: i=06: adding mze_name=[daily.20080707.gz] 
> hash=11978674440062894080
> mze_insert: i=07: adding mze_name=[daily.20080708.gz] hash=1783752625867456512
> mze_insert: i=08: adding mze_name=[daily.20080709.gz] hash=373697339124088832
> mze_insert: i=09: adding mze_name=[daily.20080710.gz] 
> hash=12364645971085230080
> mze_insert: i=10: adding mze_name=[daily.20080711.gz] 
> hash=13147843840310247424
> mze_insert: i=11: adding mze_name=[daily.20080712.gz] 
> hash=10395742459047968768
> mze_insert: i=12: adding mze_name=[daily.20080713.gz] 
> hash=10208414471135690752
> mze_insert: i=13: adding mze_name=[daily.20080714.gz] 
> hash=15862282000518873088
> mze_insert: i=14: adding mze_name=[daily.20080715.gz] 
> hash=13964729096542879744
> mze_insert: i=15: adding mze_name=[daily.20080716.gz] 
> hash=16717135042526052352
> mze_insert: i=16: adding mze_name=[daily.20080717.gz] 
> hash=18019389811235749888
> mze_insert: i=17: adding mze_name=[daily.20080718.gz] hash=4966448873967976448
> mze_insert: i=18: adding mze_name=[daily.20080719.gz] hash=6413922602988863488
> mze_insert: i=19: adding mze_name=[daily.20080720.gz] hash=5759986962857459712
> mze_insert: i=20: adding mze_name=[daily.20080721.gz] hash=5909039301739413504
> mze_insert: i=21: adding mze_name=[daily.20080722.gz] hash=8372896562954633216
> mze_insert: i=22: adding mze_name=[daily.20080723.gz] hash=7627984238364590080
> mze_insert: i=23: adding mze_name=[daily.20080724.gz] hash=4059358240683589632
> mze_insert: i=24: adding mze_name=[daily.20080725.gz] hash=2718826723431940096
> mze_insert: i=25: adding mze_name=[daily.20080726.gz] hash=254638509216759808
> mze_insert: i=26: adding mze_name=[daily.20080727.gz] hash=2190475858316099584
> mze_insert: i=27: adding mze_name=[daily.20080728.gz] 
> hash=11573062813869932544
> mze_insert: i=28: adding mze_name=[daily.20080729.gz] 
> hash=13651902507838865408
> mze_insert: i=29: adding mze_name=[daily.20080730.gz] hash=1423949746464096256
> mze_insert: i=30: adding mze_name=[daily.20080731.gz] hash=1021306183190839296
>  mzap_open: i=31: empty mze_name
> mze_insert: i=32: ALREADY EXISTS! mze_name=[daily.20080706.gz] 
> hash=13533957483210473472
>  mzap_open: i=33: empty mze_name
> mze_insert: i=34: ALREADY EXISTS! mze_name=[daily.20080711.gz] 
> hash=13147843840310247424
>  mzap_open: i=35: empty mze_name
> mze_insert: i=36: ALREADY EXISTS! mze_name=[daily.20080715.gz] 
> hash=13964729096542879744
>  mzap_open: i=37: empty mze_name
>  mzap_open: i=38: empty mze_name
> 
> zpool scrub shows not errors.
> 
> Any idea how we ended up in this situation?
> 
> If there is ZFS developer interested in tracking it further down, maybe Dmitry
> will be able to provide snapshot of this corrupted file system.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-code mailing list
> zfs-code at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-code

Reply via email to