What does 'zfs list -o name,mountpoint' and 'zfs mount' show after the import? My only guess is that you have some explicit mountpoint set that's confusing the DSl-orderered mounting code. If this is the case, this was fixed in build 46 (likely to be in S10u4) to always mount datasets in mountpoint order, regardless of their hierarchical relationship. However, you may be hitting some other bug that we haven't seen before.
- Eric On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:32:08PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello Mark, > > Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 3:23:43 PM, you wrote: > > MM> Robert, > > MM> Are you sure that nfs-s5-p0/d5110 and nfs-s5-p0/d5111 are mounted > MM> following the import? These messages imply that the d5110 and d5111 > MM> directories in the top-level filesystem of pool nfs-s5-p0 are not > MM> empty. Could you verify that 'df /nfs-s5-p0/d5110' displays > MM> nfs-s5-p0/d5110 as the "Filesystem" (and not just nfs-s5-p0)? > > They are definitely mounted and not empty. And df reports them as > mounted file systems. > > -- > Best regards, > Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://milek.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
