Hello Roch, Thursday, August 17, 2006, 11:08:37 AM, you wrote: R> My general principles are:
R> If you can, to improve you 'Availability' metrics, R> let ZFS handle one level of redundancy; R> For Random Read performance prefer mirrors over R> raid-z. If you use raid-z, group together a smallish R> number of volumes. R> setup volumes that correspond to small number of R> drives (smallest you can bear) with a volume R> interlace that is in the [1M-4M] range. Why that big interlace? With lot of small reads it could actually introduce large overhead, right? I can understand something like 960KB, but 4M? -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
