[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:38:05PM +0200, Roch wrote: > > > > > > http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/zfs_and_oltp > > After reading this page and taking into consideration my (not so big) > knowledge > of ZFS it came to my mind that putting e.g. Oracle on both UFS+DIO _and_ > ZFS would be the best solution _at_the_moment_. E.g redo logs and undo > tablespace on ZFS (because its COW nature so that all writes to these > files will go with full speed) and all the rest database files on UFS+DIO. > > What do you think ? >
You may gain some perf _today_ by using UFS/DIO at the expense of integrity/availability/ease of use. That would be the tradeoff. It's also given that mileage will vary. -r > przemol > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
