On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:03:33PM -0500, Toby Thain wrote: > As others have pointed out, you wouldn't have reached this point with > redundancy - the file would have remained intact despite the hardware > failure. It is strictly correct that to restore the data you'd need > to refer to a backup, in this case.
Well, you could get really unlucky no matter how much redundancy you have, but now we're splitting hairs :) (The more redundancy, the worse your luck has to be to be truly out of luck.) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
