On 13-Jan-07, at 11:52 AM, roland wrote:
i have come across an interesting article at :
http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2859&p=5
it`s about sata vs. sas/scsi realiability , telling that typical
desktop sata drives
".....on average experience an Unrecoverable Error every 12.5
terabytes written or read (EUR of 1 in 1014 bits)."
since the 1TB drive is out very soon, this really makes me afraid
of data integrity on my backup disks, so the question is:
will zfs help detect/prevent such single-bit errors ?
i`m somewhat sure, that it will help if i use raid1 setup with ZFS
- it`s self healing will detect those single-bit-errors and correct
this - but what about single disk setup ?
can zfs protect my data from such single-bit-errors with a single
drive ?
I suppose you could have redundancy between slices. But this is
fairly pointless since it won't protect against the certainty of
eventual whole-drive problems.
--T
regards
roland
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss