Hello Ceri,

Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 1:48:50 PM, you wrote:

CD> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:07:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello Zoram,
>> 
>> Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 11:27:48 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> ZT> Hi Ceri,
>> 
>> ZT> I just saw your mail today. I'm replying In case you haven't found a 
>> ZT> solution.
>> 
>> ZT> This is
>> 
>> ZT> 6475304 zfs core dumps when trying to create new spool using "did" device
>> 
>> ZT> The workaround suggests:
>> 
>> ZT> Set environmental variable
>> 
>> ZT> NOINUSE_CHECK=1
>> 
>> ZT> And the problem does not exists.
>> 
>> Of course the question is why use ZFS over DID?

CD> Actually the question is probably: why shouldn't I?  I can fall back
CD> to the real device name, but d8 is a lot easier to remember than
CD> c1t0100000CF1F459EE00002A0045AF6B6Ed0 and has the advantage of being
CD> guaranteed to be the same across all nodes.

CD> What's the disadvantage?

Another layer? Less performance? Ok, I'm only guessing.

-- 
Best regards,
 Robert                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to