Hello Ceri, Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 1:48:50 PM, you wrote:
CD> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:07:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote: >> Hello Zoram, >> >> Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 11:27:48 AM, you wrote: >> >> ZT> Hi Ceri, >> >> ZT> I just saw your mail today. I'm replying In case you haven't found a >> ZT> solution. >> >> ZT> This is >> >> ZT> 6475304 zfs core dumps when trying to create new spool using "did" device >> >> ZT> The workaround suggests: >> >> ZT> Set environmental variable >> >> ZT> NOINUSE_CHECK=1 >> >> ZT> And the problem does not exists. >> >> Of course the question is why use ZFS over DID? CD> Actually the question is probably: why shouldn't I? I can fall back CD> to the real device name, but d8 is a lot easier to remember than CD> c1t0100000CF1F459EE00002A0045AF6B6Ed0 and has the advantage of being CD> guaranteed to be the same across all nodes. CD> What's the disadvantage? Another layer? Less performance? Ok, I'm only guessing. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss