> > Ivan Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > However, this raises another concert that during > recent discussions regarding to disk layout of a zfs > system > (http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID= > 25679&tstart=0) it was said that currently we'd > better give zfs the whole device (rather than slices) > and keep swap off zfs devices for better performance. > > > If the above recommendation still holds, we still > have to have a swap device out there othere than > devices managed by zfs. is this limited by the design > or implementation of zfs? > > > > Ivan. > > > > ZFS supports swap to /dev/vzol, however, I do not > have data related to > performance. > Also note that ZFS does not support dump yet, see RFE > 5008936.
Got it, thanks, and a more general question, in a single disk root pool scenario, what advantage zfs will provide over ufs w/ logging? And when zfs boot integrated in neveda, will live upgrade work with zfs root? Cheers, Ivan. > > Lin > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss > This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
