Hello Thomas, Saturday, March 24, 2007, 1:06:47 AM, you wrote:
>> The problem is that the failure modes are very different for networks and >> presumably reliable local disk connections. Hence NFS has a lot of error >> handling code and provides well understood error handling semantics. Maybe >> what you really want is NFS? TN> We thought about using NFS as backend for as much as possible applications TN> but we need to have redundancy for the fileserver itself too Then use Sun Cluster + NFS, both are for free. Now it won't solve your 'sync' support but maybe you can try: SC + NFS mounted on clients with directio, UFS on server mounted with directio. It probably will be really slow, but everythink should be consistent all the time I guess. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
