> 6322646 ZFS should gracefully handle all devices > failing (when writing) > > Which is being worked on. Using a redundant > configuration prevents this > from happening.
What do you mean with "redundant"? All our servers has 2 or 4 HBAs, 2 or 4 fc switches and storage arrays with redundant controllers. We used only RAID10 zpools but we still had them corrupted. > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/faq/#whyno > fsck > > Writing such a tool is effectively impossible. For > the one known > corruption bug we've encountered (and since fixed, we > provided the > 'zfs_recover' /etc/system switch, but it only works > for this particular > bug. Without understanding the underlying pathology > it's impossible to > "fix" a ZFS pool. I think this is a very importand drawback of ZFS. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
