Over the weekend I got ZFS up and running under FreeBSD and have
had much the same experience with it that I have with Solaris - it works
great out of the box and once configured, it is easy to forget about.
So far the only real difference is anything you might tune via /etc/system
(or mdb) is done via sysctl.*

I have a server for internal use where we keep files for some months
and then delete them. Usually we have some TB and I really wanted to
use FreeBSD since it also run it as a mail-server and
trouble-ticket-server.

But ufs2 does not scale well especially if background-fsck is not
possible after a unplanned restart. When zfs came along I was anxious
to try it out. So I installed solaris on a test-server but managing
apps on the solaris-server is a bit of a pain with my (FreeBSD)
background. So last week I replaced the solaris-test-box with FreeBSD
and zfs and is impressed with Pawel's great work :-)

And a big thanks to Pawel for making this available - its letting me
use ZFS where I couldn't before!

Me too thank Pawel. Are there any tunables that I can look at to
improve writes? The server is a 2-way dell pe 2850 at 2.8 GHz and 4 GB
ram with HTT disabled and 2 qlogic 2300 hba's. I boot of internal
scsi-disks and have attached a nexsan atabeast with 10 TB of storage
where /usr/local and /home is located. Writes are usually approx.
20-30 MB/s (zpool iostat 1) and peak at 40-45 MB/s. I have recompiled
the kernel without WITNESS.

The nexsan has two raid-controllers where each controller has five
LUN's. All 10 LUN's are in a raidz2 pool. Each LUN itself is four 400
GB disks in hardware raid-5. The nexsan can't do jbod.

Being able to install apps using ports is a great relief. I can help
test on my server if needed.

regards
Claus
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to