They do need to start on the "next" filesystem and it seems very ideal for Apple. If they didn't then apple will be making a huge mistake because whatever FS's exist now, zfs has already pretty much trump'd it on almost every level except for maturity.
I'm expecting ZFS and ISCSI(initiator and target) in Leopard. After all, OS X borrows from FreeBSD.. FreeBSD 7 has zfs ;) Andy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Scharf Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:00 PM To: Toby Thain Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] XServe Raid & Complex Storage Considerations Toby Thain wrote: > > On 25-Apr-07, at 12:17 PM, cedric briner wrote: > >> hello the list, >> >> After reading the _excellent_ ZFS Best Practices Guide, I've seen in >> the section: ZFS and Complex Storage Consideration that we should >> configure the storage system to ignore command which will flush the >> memory into the disk. >> >> So does some of you knows how to tell Xserve Raid to ignore ``fsync'' >> requests ? >> >> After the announce that zfs will be included in Tiger, > > Much as I would like to see it, I am not aware of any such > announcement from Apple, only rumours. FWIW, I heard the rumor from their sales guys. The wouldn't say whether it ZFS would be available in 10.5 or 10.6, and they wouldn't say whether it ZFS-boot would be available when ZFS is introduced -- but they did confirm that it's being worked on. -Luke _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
