mike wrote: > Isn't the benefit of ZFS that it will allow you to use even the most > unreliable risks and be able to inform you when they are attempting to > corrupt your data? > > To me it sounds like he is a SOHO user; may not have a lot of funds to > go out and swap hardware on a whim like a company might. > There's a limit to haw much even ZFS can do with bad disks, sure it can manage a failing mirror better than SVM or low end hardware RAID, but given the motley collection of drives in the OP's system, there aren't that many options. Given the silly prices of new drives (320GB are about the best $/GB), replacement is the best long term option. Otherwise, mirroring the largest two drives and discard the small one might be a good option.
Ian _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
