> > On May 10, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Matthew Flanagan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a test server that I use for testing my > different jumpstart > > installations. This system is continuously > installed and > > reinstalled with different system builds. > > For some builds I have a finish script that creates > a zpool using > > the utility found in the Solaris 10 update 3 > miniroot. > > > > I have found an issue where the zpool command fails > to create a new > > zpool if the system previously had a UFS filesystem > on the same slice. > > > > The command and error is: > > > > zpool create -f -R /a -m /srv srv c1t0d0s6 > > cannot create 'srv': one or more vdevs refer to the > same device > > > > Works fine for me: > # df -kh > Filesystem size used avail capacity > Mounted on > dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 17G 4.1G 13G 24% / > ... > /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s6 24G 24M 24G 1% > /zfs0 > mount /zfs0 > # zpool create -f -R /a -m /srv srv c1t1d0s6 > # zpool status > pool: srv > te: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > srv ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t1d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 > known data errors > > > eric > >
That works for me too. Perhaps you should actually follow my steps to reproduce the issue? matthew > > > The steps to reproduce are: > > > > 1. build a Solaris 10 Update 3 system via jumpstart > with the > > following partitioning and only UFS filesystems: > > > > partitioning explicit > > filesys rootdisk.s0 6144 / logging > > filesys rootdisk.s1 1024 swap > > filesys rootdisk.s3 4096 /var logging,nosuid > > filesys rootdisk.s6 free /srv logging > > filesys rootdisk.s7 50 unnamed > > > > 2. Then rebuild the same system via jumpstart with > the following > > partitioning with slice 6 left unnamed so that a > finish script may > > create a zpool with the command 'zpool create -f -R > /a -m /srv srv > > cntndns6': > > > > partitioning explicit > > filesys rootdisk.s0 6144 / logging > > filesys rootdisk.s1 1024 swap > > filesys rootdisk.s3 4096 /var logging,nosuid > > filesys rootdisk.s6 free unnamed > > filesys rootdisk.s7 50 unnamed > > > > Has anyone hit this issue and is this a known bug > with a workaround? > > > > regards > > > > matthew > > > > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > zfs-discuss mailing list > > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss > This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
