Le 22 mai 07 à 16:23, Dick Davies a écrit :
<allyourbase>
Take off every ZIL!
http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/02/12/zil-
communication
</allyourbase>
Cause client corrupt but also database corruption and just about
anything that carefully manages data.
Yes the zpool will survive, but it may be the only thing that does.
So please don't do this.
-r
On 22/05/07, Albert Chin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:11:36PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:09:46PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > But still, how is tar/SSH any more multi-threaded than tar/NFS?
>
> It's not that it is, but that NFS sync semantics and ZFS sync
> semantics conspire against single-threaded performance.
What's why we have "set zfs:zfs_nocacheflush = 1" in /etc/system.
But,
that's only helps ZFS. Is there something similar for NFS?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns
http://number9.hellooperator.net/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
