because i don't want bitrot to destroy the thousands of pictures and memories i keep? i keep important personal documents, etc. filesystem corruption is not a feature to me. perhaps i spoke incorrectly but i consider COW to be one of the reasons a filesystem can keep itself in check, the disk write will be transactional and guaranteed if it says successful, correct?
i still plan on using offsite storage services to maintain the physical level of redundancy (house burns down, equipment is stolen, HDs will always die at some point, etc.) but as a user who has had corruption happen many times (FAT32, NTFS, XFS, JFS) it is encouraging to see more options that put emphasis on integrity... On 6/14/07, Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On June 14, 2007 3:57:55 PM -0700 mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as a more SOHO user i like ZFS mainly for it's COW and integrity, and huh. As a SOHO user, why do you care about COW? -frank
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
