Those are interesting results. Does this mean you've already written lzo support into ZFS? If not, that would be a great next step -- licensing issues can be sorted out later...
Adam On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:40:48AM -0700, roland wrote: > btw - is there some way to directly compare lzjb vs lzo compression - to see > which performs better and using less cpu ? > > here those numbers from my little benchmark: > > |lzo |6m39.603s |2.99x > |gzip |7m46.875s |3.41x > |lzjb |7m7.600s |1.79x > > i`m just curious about these numbers - with lzo i got better speed and better > compression in comparison to lzjb > > nothing against lzjb compression - it's pretty nice - but why not taking a > closer look here? maybe here is some room for improvement.... > > roland > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/ahl _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
