Jürgen Keil wrote: >>> And 6560174 might be a duplicate of 6445725 >> I see what you mean. Unfortunately there does not >> look to be a work-around. > > Nope, no work-around. This is a scsa1394 bug; it > has some issues when it is used from interrupt context. > > I have some source code diffs, that are supposed to > fix the issue, see this thread: > > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=46190
By coincidence, I spent some time dtracing 6560174 yesterday afternoon on b62, and these bugs are indeed duplicates. I never noticed 6445725 because my system wasn't hanging but as the notes say, the fix for 6434435 changes the problem, and instead the error that gets propogated back from t1394_write() causes "transport rejected" messages. I see your proposed fix (which looks very plausible) is dated over a year ago... Have you heard anything on when it might get integrated? Pete. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
