> So that leaves us with a Samba vs NFS issue (not > related to > ZFS). We know that NFS is able to create file _at > most_ at > one file per server I/O latency. Samba appears better > and this is > what we need to investigate. It might be better in a > way > that NFS can borrow (maybe through some better NFSV4 > delegation > code) or Samba might be better by being careless with > data. > If we find such an NFS improvement it will help all > backend > filesystems not just ZFS.
Just curious: Was this nfs-samba ghost ever caught and sent back to the spirit realm? :) This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
