On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote: > Paul Armor wrote: >> Hi, >> I was wondering if anyone would know if this is just an accounting-type >> error with the recorded "version=" stored on disk, or if there are/could-be >> any deeper issues with an "upgraded" zpool? >> >> I created a pool under a Sol10_x86_u3 install (11/06?), and zdb correctly >> reported the pool as a "version=3" pool. I reinstalled the OS with a u4 >> (08/07), ran zpool grade, was told I successfully upgraded from version 3 >> to version 4, but zdb reported "version=3". I unmounted the zfs, >> remounted, and zdb still reported "version=3". I reran zpool upgrade, and >> was told there were no pools to upgrade. >> >> I blew away that pool, and created a new pool and zdb correctly reported >> "version=4". >> >> Perhaps I'm being pedantic, but the version thing on an upgraded pool >> bugged me ;-) >> >> Does anyone have any thoughts/experiences on other surprises that may be >> lying in wait on an "upgraded" zpool? >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ > Hi Paul > is it not zpool upgrade -a, > but I could be wrong > > I seem to remember zpool upgrade does not actually upgrade unless you specify > the -a. > > Enda
Hi Enda, thanks... from the manpage, I thought 'upgrade -a" meant to upgrade all pools. Thanks, Paul _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
