> > Would the bootloader have issues here? On x86 I would > imagine that you > would have to reload grub, would a similar thing need > to be done on SPARC? >
Yeah, that's also what I'm thinking, apparently zfs mirror doesn't take care of boot sector. So as of now, estimating size of a zfs root pool is still required, better not to go with a carefree grow-as-needed mindset. Ivan. > > Ivan Wang wrote: > >>> Erik Trimble wrote: > >>> After both drives are replaced, you will > automatically see the > >>> additional space. > >>> > >> I believe currently after the last replace an > >> import/export sequence > >> is needed to force zfs to see the increased size. > >> > > > > What if root fs is also in this pool? will there be > any limitation for a pool containing /? > > > > Thanks, > > Ivan. > > > > > >> Neil. > >> > >> ______________________________________________ > >> zfs-discuss mailing list > >> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > >> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > >> ss > >> > > > > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > zfs-discuss mailing list > > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss > > > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
