Hello msl, Thursday, November 15, 2007, 11:13:41 PM, you wrote:
m> Hello all... m> I'm migrating a nfs server from linux to solaris, and all m> clients(linux) are using read/write block sizes of 8192. That was m> the better performance that i got, and it's working pretty well m> (nfsv3). I want to use all the zfs' advantages, and i know i can m> have a performance loss, so i want to know if there is a m> "recomendation" for bs on nfs/zfs, or what do you think about it. m> I must test, or there is no need to make such configurations with zfs? m> Thanks very much for your time! m> Leal. IIRC Linux nfs server will commit all nfs requests once they are in memory, even for metadata ops, while solaris nfs/zfs will commit after they are written to disks - so by default you could see big perfromance difference between Linux and Solaris in nfs serving. If you want the same behavior on Solaris then disable ZIL. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
