Hello,

I just made a setup in our lab which should make ZFS fly, but unfortunately 
performance is significantly lower than expected: for large sequential data 
transfers write speed is about 50 MB/s while I was expecting at least 150 MB/s.

Setup
-----
The setup consists of five servers in total: one OpenSolaris ZFS server and 
four SAN servers. ZFS accesses the SAN servers via iSCSI and IPoIB.

* ZFS Server
Operating system: OpenSolaris build 78.
CPU: Two Intel Xeon CPU's, eight cores in total.
RAM: 16 GB.
Disks: not relevant for this test.

* SAN Servers
Operating system: Linux 2.6.22.18 kernel, 64-bit + iSCSI Enterprise Target 
(IET). IET has been configured such that it performs both read and write 
caching.
CPU: Intel Xeon CPU E5310, 1.60GHz, four cores in total.
RAM: two servers with 8 GB RAM, one with 4 GB RAM, one with 2 GB RAM.
Disks: 16 disks in total: two disks with the Linux OS and 14 set up in RAID-0 
via LVM. The LVM volume is exported via iSCSI and used by ZFS.

These SAN servers give excellent performance results when accessed via Linux' 
open-iscsi initiator.

* Network
4x SDR InfiniBand. The raw transfer speed of this network is 8 Gbit/s. Netperf 
reports 1.6 Gbit/s between the ZFS server and one SAN server (IPoIB, 
single-threaded). iSCSI transfer speed between the ZFS server and one SAN 
server is about 150 MB/s.


Performance test
----------------
Software: xdd (see also http://www.ioperformance.com/products.htm). I modified 
xdd such that the -dio command line option enables O_RSYNC and O_DSYNC in 
open() instead of calling directio().
Test command: xdd -verbose -processlock -dio -op write -targets 1 testfile 
-reqsize 1 -blocksize $((2**20)) -mbytes 1000 -passes 3
This test command triggers synchronous writes with a block size of 1 MB 
(verified this with truss). I am using synchronous writes because these give 
the same performance results as very large buffered writes (large compared to 
ZFS' cache size).

Write performance reported by xdd for synchronous sequential writes: 50 MB/s, 
which is lower than expected.


Any help with improving the performance of this setup is highly appreciated.


Bart Van Assche.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to