On May 27, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Rob Logan wrote: > >> There is something more to consider with SSDs uses as a cache device. > why use SATA as the interface? perhaps > http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/34065/135/ > would be better? (no experience)
We are pretty happy with RAMSAN SSD's (ours is RAM based, not flash). -Andy > > > "cards will start at 80 GB and will scale to 320 and 640 GB next year. > By the end of 2008, Fusion io also hopes to roll out a 1.2 TB > card..... > 160 parallel pipelines that can read data at 800 megabytes per second > and write at 600 MB/sec.... 4K blocks and then streaming eight > simultaneous 1 GB reads and writes. In that test, the ioDrive > clocked in at 100,000 operations per second... beat $30 dollars a > GB," > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
