Mark,

Thanks for your detailed review comments. I will check where the latest
man pages are online and get back to you.

In the meantime, I can file the bugs to get these issues fixed on your
behalf.

Thanks again,

Cindy

Marc Bevand wrote:
> I noticed some errors in ls(1), acl(5) and the ZFS Admin Guide about 
> ZFS/NFSv4 
> ACLs:
> 
> ls(1): "read_acl (r)  Permission  to  read  the ACL of a file." The compact 
> representation of read_acl is "c", not "r".
> 
> ls(1): "-c | -v    The same as -l, and in addition displays the [...]" The 
> options are in fact "-/ c" or "-/ v". 
> 
> ls(1): "The display in verbose mode (/ v) uses full attribute [...]".  This 
> should read "(-/ v)".
> 
> acl(5): "execute (X)". The x should be lowercase: "(x)"
> 
> acl(5) does not document 3 ACEs: success access (S), failed access (F), 
> inherited (I).
> 
> The ZFS Admin Guide does not document the same 3 ACEs.
> 
> The ZFS Admin Guide gives examples listing a compact representation of ACLs 
> containing only 6 inheritance flags instead of 7. For example in the 
> section "Setting and Displaying ACLs on ZFS Files in Compact Format":
> # ls -V file.1
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root       root      206663 Feb 16 11:00 file.1
>             owner@:--x-----------:------:deny
>                                   ^^^^^^
>                          7th position for flag 'I' missing
> 
> By the way, where can I find the latest version of the ls(1) manpage online ? 
> I cannot find it, neither on src.opensolaris.org, nor in the manpage 
> consolidation download center [1]. I'd like to check whether the errors I 
> found in ls(1) are fixed before submitting a bug report.
> 
> [1] http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/manpages/
> 
> -marc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to