Miles On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "tn" == Thomas Nau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > tn> Nevertheless during the first hour of operation after onlining > tn> we recognized numerous checksum errors on the formerly > tn> offlined device. We decided to scrub the pool and after > tn> several hours we got about 3500 error in 600GB of data. > > Did you use 'zpool offline' when you took them down, or did you > offline them some other way, like by breaking the network connection, > stopping the iSCSI target daemon, or 'iscsiadm remove > discovery-address ..' on the initiator?
We did a "zpool offline", nothing else, before we took the iSCSI server down > Another iSCSI problem: for me, the targets I've 'zpool offline'd will > automatically ONLINE themselves when iSCSI rediscovers them. but only > sometimes. I haven't figured out how to predict when they will and > when they won't. I never experienced that one but we usually don't touch any of the iSCSI settings as long as a devices is offline. At least as long as we don't have to for any reason Thomas ----------------------------------------------------------------- GPG fingerprint: B1 EE D2 39 2C 82 26 DA A5 4D E0 50 35 75 9E ED _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
