Mark Shellenbaum wrote: > Paul B. Henson wrote: >> >> Are the libsec undocumented interfaces likely to remain the same when the >> acl_t structure changes? They will still require adding the prototypes to >> my code so the compiler knows what to make of them, but less chance of >> breakage is good. >> >> > > I can't guarantee they will remain in the future. Thats why they aren't > documented. > > It may be that with appropriate iterators and other interfaces they will > no longer be needed. > > I'm working on a similar problem to Paul (sorry I didn't get back to you Paul - shifting priorities!), writing a PHP extension for ACLs, and I've fallen into the trap of using acl_info. Is this work you mention happening in the open, or in side of Sun? If it's the former, how can we get involved?
Ian _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
