> So what are the downsides to this? If both nodes were to crash and > I used the same technique to recreate the ramdisk I would lose any > transactions in the slog at the time of the crash, but the physical > disk image is still in a consistent state right (just not from my > apps point of view)?
You would lose transactions, but the pool would still reflect a consistent state. > So is this idea completely crazy? On the contrary; it's very clever. Adam -- Adam Leventhal, Fishworks http://blogs.sun.com/ahl _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
