On Fri, January 23, 2009 12:01, Glenn Lagasse wrote: > * David Dyer-Bennet (d...@dd-b.net) wrote:
>> But what I'm wondering is, are there known bugs in 101b that make >> scrubbing inadvisable with that code? I'd love to *find out* what >> horrors >> may be lurking. > > There's nothing in the release notes for 2008.11 (based on 101b) about > issues running scrub. I've been using 101b for some time now and > haven't seen or heard of any issues running scrub. > > There's always bugs. But I'm pretty certain there isn't a known 'zfs > scrub is inadvisable under any and all conditions' bug laying about. > I've certainly not heard of such a thing (and it would be pretty big > news for 2008.11 if true). Thanks. I appreciate the qualifications, and agree that there are, indeed, always bugs. Okay; I think I'll make one last check of my own through the buglist (so it won't be your fault if I muck up my data :-)), and if nothing turns up that scares me I will run the scrub and see what happens. Hmmm; maybe update ONE of the two backups first. It's at times like this when I really miss relatively cheap backup tapes (current tapes that I've seen aren't relatively cheap). -- David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
