> Mario Goebbels wrote: > >> The good news is that ZFS is getting popular > enough on consumer-grade > >> hardware. The bad news is that said hardware has > a different set of > >> failure modes, so it takes a bit of work to become > resilient to them. > >> This is pretty high on my short list. > >> > > > > One thing I'd like to see is an _easy_ option to > fall back onto older > > uberblocks when the zpool went belly up for a silly > reason. Something > > that doesn't involve esoteric parameters supplied > to zdb. > > > > This is CR 6667683 > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6667683
I think that would solve 99% of ZFS corruption problems! Is there any EDT for this patch? tnx gino -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
