On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 03:16:09PM -0700, milosz wrote:
> yeah i pretty much agree with you on this.  the fact that no one has
> brought this up before is a pretty good indication of the demand.
> there are about 1000 things i'd rather see fixed/improved than max
> disk size on a 32bit platform.

I'd say a lot of folks out there have plenty of enterprise-class 32-bit
hardware still in production in their datacenters.  I know I do.
Several IBM BladeCenters with 32-bit blades and attached storage... 

It would be "nice" to be able to do ZFS on these platforms (>1TB that
is), but I understand if it's not a priority.  But there's certainly a
lot of life left in 32-bit hardware, and not all of it is cheap to
replace.

Ray

> 
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Neal Pollack<neal.poll...@sun.com> wrote:
> > On 06/16/09 02:39 PM, roland wrote:
> >>
> >> so, we have a 128bit fs, but only support for 1tb on 32bit?
> >>
> >> i`d call that a bug, isn`t it ?  is there a bugid for this? ;)
> >>
> >
> > Well, opinion is welcome.
> > I'd call it an RFE.
> >
> > With 64 bit versions of the CPU chips so inexpensive these days,
> > how much money do you want me to invest in moving modern features
> > and support to old versions of the OS?
> >
> > I mean, Microsoft could, on a technical level, backport all new features
> > from
> > Vista and Windows Seven to Windows 95.  But if they did that, their current
> > offering
> > would lag, since all the engineers would be working on the older stuff.
> >
> > Heck, you can buy a 64 bit CPU motherboard very very cheap.  The staff that
> > we do have
> > are working on modern features for the 64bit version, rather than spending
> > all their time
> > "in the rear-view mirror".   Live life forward.  Upgrade.
> > Changing all the data structures in the 32 bit OS to handle super larger
> > disks, is, well, sorta
> > like trying to get a Pentium II to handle HD Video.  I'm sure, with enough
> > time and money,
> > you might find a way.  But is it worth it?  Or is it cheaper to buy a new
> > pump?
> >
> > Neal
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to