richard wrote: > Preface: yes, shrink will be cool. But we've been > running highly > available, > mission critical datacenters for more than 50 years > without shrink being > widely available.
I would debate that. I remember batch windows and downtime delaying one's career movement. Today we are 24x7 where an outage can kill an entire business. > Do it exactly the same way you do it for UFS. You've > been using UFS > for years without shrink, right? Surely you have > procedures in > place :-) While I haven't taken a formal survey, everywhere I look I see JFS on AIX and VxFS on Solaris. I haven't been in a production UFS shop this decade. > Backout plans are not always simple reversals. A > well managed site will > have procedures for rolling upgrades. I agree with everything you wrote. Today other technologies allow live changes to the pool, so companies use those technologies instead of ZFS. > There is more than one way to skin a cat. Which entirely misses the point. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
