On Thu, September 17, 2009 04:29, Chris Murray wrote:

> 2. New disk E. Replaced A with E.
> 3. Part way through resilver, drive D was 'removed'
> 4. 700+ persistent errors detected, and lots of checksum errors on all
> drives. Surprised by this - I thought the absence of one drive could be
> tolerated?

On a RAIDZ, the absence of one drive can be tolerated.  But note that you
said "part way through the resilver".  Drive E is not fully present, AND
drive D was removed -- you have 1+ drives missing, in a configuration that
can tolerate only 1 drive missing.

-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to