Hi Darren,
More below...
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Tristan Ball wrote:
Obviously sending it deduped is more efficient in terms of bandwidth
and CPU time on the recv side, but it may also be more complicated to
achieve?
A stream can be deduped even if the on disk format isn't and vice versa.
Is the send dedup'ing more efficient if the filesystem is already
depdup'd? If both are enabled do they share anything?
-Kyle
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss